- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Development, implementation and evaluation of a smartphone application aimed to reduce sedentary time and increase physical activity among Indian sedentary office workers – findings from SMART-STEP trial
BMC Public Health volume 25, Article number: 1806 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Excessive sedentary time (ST) is linked to an increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases. Although various behavioral interventions have emerged to reduce ST, the potential of smartphone (SmPh)-based interventions remains relatively unexplored in workplace settings. This study aimed to explore the development, implementation and acceptability of a SmPh application among Indian desk-based office workers.
Methods
One hundred thirty-six office workers were randomised to one of three interventions for six months: (1) SmPh-based ST and physical activity (PA) reminders (SMART); (2) traditional education (TRADE) and (3) usual work group (CONT). A threshold of 70% adherence (equivalent to responding to at least 580 out of 828 assigned prompts) was used to classify participants as ‘compliant’. Of 44 SMART group participants who were assigned to 24 weeks of intervention, nine participants were purposefully selected based on compliance, Moreover, they were interviewed for potential barriers associated with the SmPh application using semi-deductive approach.
Results
The SMART STEP application was developed over eight months, during which three versions were created and pilot tested. The cost of application development was reasonable (≈ $1,860). Of 44 participants who received SmPh application-based reminders, 37 completed the two follow-ups at 3rd and 6th month. Mean prompt engagement rates, defined as ‘the percentage of prompts participants actively responded to’, during the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th months were 77% (n = 107), 59% (n = 82), 54% (n = 74), 45% (n = 63), 43% (n = 59), and 31% (n = 43), respectively. Barriers such as workload, lack of movement sensing, and insufficient organizational and peer support were key factors contributing to the decline in long-term engagement among office workers.
Conclusion
The SMART-STEP application appears to be an affordable and promising solution for reducing ST and promoting PA among office workers in low-resource settings. However, enhancements such as embedding movement sensing technology, organizational policies and peer education are needed to improve long-term usability and acceptability.
Trial registration
Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/03/024138) registered on 20/03/2020.
Background
Prolonged sedentary time (ST), defined as any waking time characterized by low energy expenditure of less than 1.5 metabolic equivalents while in a sitting or a reclined posture [1], and insufficient physical activity (PA), defined as engaging in less than 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA per week, MVPA [2] are now recognized as independent risk factors for a myriad of chronic diseases, including diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and cancer [3]. Hence public health guidelines underscore the importance of reducing ST and increasing MVPA for reducing chronic disease risk [2]. Although MVPA [defined as activity exceeding three metabolic equivalents (METs)] is known for its health benefits, most individuals in modern desk-based jobs struggle to meet the recommended 150 min of MVPA in a week [4]. Consequently, average MVPA levels remains low, a situation further exacerbated by higher ST, which collectively elevates the risk of chronic diseases among sedentary office workers. Recent accelerometer-based studies have confirmed that desk-based office workers spend approximately 73% of their working hours sedentary [5,6,7,8]. During their total waking hours, they remain sedentary for about 59% to 66% of the time [5,6,7,8]. Interrupting prolonged sedentary bouts with light-intensity PA (LIPA), defined as activity that expends between 1.6 and 2.9 metabolic equivalents, is viewed as equally beneficial to MVPA in countering cardiometabolic disease risk [9]. While MVPA offers significant benefits for aerobic fitness and cardiometabolic health, maintaining such intensity levels in everyday settings can be challenging, often resulting in low adherence to prescribed exercise regimens [10]. In contrast, LIPA is more feasible and less daunting, particularly for older adults and individuals with chronic conditions, as it demands less energy expenditure and is easier to integrate into daily routines [11]. Moreover, interventions promoting LIPA tend to be more enjoyable, leading to higher adherence rates [12].
Though numerous behavioral interventions have been developed to reduce ST and PA at workplaces, Chu et al., 2016 has divided the interventions into three categories: (1) individual level behavioral counselling – goal setting, action planning [13]; (2) environmental level—installing active workstation; (3) multicomponent interventions combining the above two interventions [14]. Environmental and multicomponent interventions incur costs, require expertise, and necessitate higher organizational policy-level changes. To break a habitual activity like sitting, which requires no conscious effort, interventions involving LIPA should be simple, easily delivered and adapted into everyday lives [15, 16]. Smartphones (SmPh), being ubiquitous, is proposed to be an intriguing intervention for an effective behavior change at the individual level [17]. Though evidence on SmPh driven physical activities was remained unconvinced five years back [18], the findings of recent feasibility and field based trials confirm that SmPh is promising in reducing ST and increasing PA among end-users [19].
Mobile phone adoption continues to rise globally, with an estimated 5.6 billion unique mobile users as of 2023, surpassing the number of people with access to electricity or personal vehicles in many regions [20]. This widespread penetration, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like India, makes smartphones a promising tool for scalable digital health interventions. Observational studies claimed that more than 27 million urban Indian adults own android based SmPhs accounting for 9% of the total SmPh users across the globe [21]. With significant advanced in the geo-navigational systems, search engines, cameras and social media usage, the SmPhs influence the habitual behavior of Indians including movement behaviors however the large potential remains untapped.
According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cancer, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, stroke, and coronary artery disease are on the rise in Indian communities, contributing significantly to early mortality and disability-adjusted life years [22]. Physical inactivity, estimated at 41.4% in the Indian population based on the National NCD Monitoring Survey (2017–2018) [23], has now emerged as the third leading risk factor for NCDs, following tobacco use and unhealthy diet [22]. Large-scale community surveys also indicate that workplace PA constitutes a major source of total PA among rural populations, in contrast to urban residents [23]. Furthermore, India’s rapidly expanding digital market presents a unique opportunity to develop engaging and scalable PA interventions aimed at reducing physical inactivity and associated NCD risk in the population [24,25,26].
SMART-STEP trial is a cluster randomized controlled trial from India that aimed to investigate the effectiveness of SmPh-based reduction in ST and increase in PA among office workers of sedentary workplaces in India [27, 28]. The idea behind the SmPh application development was to provide nudges or prompts to interrupt their ST and to perform PA every hour for two minutes during their 9–5 PM working hours which translates to 16 min of PA and usually recommended by previous experimental studies [29, 30]. The SmPh application was developed as per the tenets of the theoretical principles laid by self-determination theory and feedback intervention theory considering the previous studies that administered digital technologies to reduce ST at workplace [31]. ‘Self-determination theory’ undermines human motivation and personality that suggest the individuals can be self-determined to perform a behavior when three innate psychological needs are fulfilled: autonomy, competence and relatedness [32]. The SmPh application aimed to improve the office worker’s autonomy (can choose or avoid the prompt and can be done at will based on the situation and task priority), competence [simple exercises that can be performed at the desk without expert supervision, completed within a specified time, and monitored through color-coded daily adherence levels indicating progress in reducing ST and increasing PA) and improve relatedness (should not interrupt daily work flow, exercises that are simple and functional and integrated within working hours so that it does not interrupt non-working hours). Figure 1a depicts the development of the SmPh application based on Self-Determination Theory, highlighting its core components: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. According to ‘feedback intervention model’ [33], once the office worker desired and self-determined to perform the desired behavior (reduce ST and increase PA at workplace), the application should provide feedback on the present adherence to prompts [three color coded icons – low (green), moderate (yellow) and high (red)], so that the office workers could modify or maintain their current behavior levels (ST and PA).
Theoretical basis of smartphone application development. Initial smartphone application development was based on self-determination model with the three constructs (autonomy, competence and relatedness). Later feedback intervention model was iterated as the feedback might improve adherence to the desired movement behaviors
Figure 1b illustrates the SmPh application components, which were developed based on the Feedback Intervention Model. We chose to ground the intervention in individual-level behavior change theories specifically, Self-Determination Theory [32] and Feedback Intervention Theory [33], because this was the first digital intervention of its kind targeting PA and ST among Indian office workers in real-world settings. Broader socio-ecological or policy-level theories (e.g., Social Cognitive Theory, Social Ecological Models) were not employed as the intervention was not implemented at the organizational or community level, and structural changes (e.g., policy adaptations, environmental modifications) might not be possible as our intervention is foundational paving the way for future theory expansion. Table 1 summarizes the operationalization of Self-determination theory and Feedback-Intervention model constructs within the SMART-STEP application.
The customized SmPh-based application which was developed for SMART-STEP trial, is described here to aid future developers and public health experts to develop cost effective SmPh-based PA promotion for sedentary office workers. Furthermore, the acceptability and usability of the customized SmPh-based application was explored in the participants who completed 24 weeks of a three arm cluster randomised controlled trial (SMART-STEP), the details can be found in the previous publications [28, 34].
The primary study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a technology-based intervention (SMART) for reducing ST/increasing PA behaviors compared to traditional workplace counselling (TRADE) and a control group (CONT), using accelerometer-measured ST/PA levels and cardiometabolic risk markers. The protocol, primary outcomes, and process evaluation of this cluster randomized controlled trial have been previously published [5, 27, 28, 34, 35]. In contrast, the present paper focuses on detailing the development process of the SmPh application used in the SMART intervention, which delivered ST/PA reminders during work hours, and examines its usability and acceptability among Indian desk-based office workers.
Methods
The manuscript conformed to the reporting guidelines based on “mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist” [36]. The checklist is reported as supplementary file S1. The study on development and the acceptability of SmPh-based intervention among office workers was conducted between March 2021 and November 2023. The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC:749/2019) approved the study, and the study was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/03/024138). The research was conducted as per the ethical principles laid by the tenets of Helsinki [37]. SMART-STEP followed three phases that aimed: (1) to develop SmPh application to provide ST/PA break reminders during work hours; (2) to assess the effectiveness of the intervention through the cluster randomised controlled trial; (3) to explore the acceptability and usability of the SmPh application among the Indian office workers [27]. The findings of the effectiveness of the SmPh application on objectively measured ST/PA levels and acceptability can be accessed elsewhere [28, 34].
Developing the exercise regime for smartphone prompts
A comprehensive review of contemporary literature on exercises suitable for inclusion in the SMART-STEP trial was conducted by the primary author (BC) between September 2018 and February 2019 during the trial’s planning phase. The exercises were adapted based on the previous literature which administered workplace ST/PA interventions and recommended dose for potential health benefits [38, 39].
The decision to provide exercise breaks every hour was informed by a combination of prior empirical evidence and practical considerations relevant to sedentary workplace settings [19, 40, 41]. Previous studies have demonstrated that interrupting prolonged sitting every 30–60 min with short bouts of PA, even as brief as 2–3 min, can yield meaningful benefits in cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal health markers [19, 42]. Additionally, hourly breaks were considered a feasible option for integration into standard office workflows without disrupting productivity, as supported by feasibility studies conducted in occupational settings [19, 40]. The exercise modality alternating between simple strengthening and stretching activities was chosen to enhance adherence, reduce monotony, and address common musculoskeletal complaints among Indian desk-based workers [43]. While the core framework was adapted from Sjøgaard et al. [25], it was supplemented by contemporary guidelines and intervention designs described in recent workplace PA literature [19, 40, 42].
Each hourly break prompt delivered by the SMART-STEP application consisted of two exercises: one strengthening and one stretching exercise. These were performed during working hours (9:00 AM – 5:00 PM), totaling approximately 16 min of activity per day. The strengthening exercises were designed to be completed in about one minute. Each involved performing a single set of 15 repetitions, with each repetition lasting 3–4 s. For exercises requiring unilateral performance (e.g., leg curls, hip raises), two sets were done with 7–8 repetitions per side. The stretching exercises were also designed to last one minute, comprising two repetitions of a 30-s static stretch per muscle group, one repetition per side. All exercises could be performed in a standing position at the workstation without requiring additional equipment or supervision. The detailed breakdown of each exercise, including frequency, intensity, and volume, is provided in Table 2. The supplementary file S2 shows the pictorial representation of both body-supported exercises and stretching exercises that were embedded in the SmPh application.
Design and development of smartphone application (SMART-STEP)
The SMART-STEP application was designed by an interdisciplinary research team comprising of public health experts, community intervention behavioral scientists and software developers. The application was purposefully designed for SmPh running on Android operating systems. Observational studies have demonstrated that Android users account for more than 90% of SmPh users in India [44, 45]. As Android based SmPhs’ are common, can be customized at low-cost, feature-richer and cost-effective, we designed SmPh application for office workers with Android SmPhs. The application development process consisted of four processes using pragmatic reiterative processes: 1) deciding the specifications of the application with the developer, 2) creating the design using wireframes and mock-ups regarding notification prompts, 3) selection of appropriate platform (Android, version 5.0 and above), developing XML layouts and SQ-lite for user log interactions, and 4) testing the prototype at alpha and beta levels. The application was developed on the JAVA platform and was saved as.apk files. The SmPh application was developed to ensure compatibility with all Android processors (v5.0 and later) and to operate seamlessly in both offline and online modes. The application was designed so that end-users can monitor their compliance daily through color coding: green (attempted more than four out of six daily prompts), orange (attempted two to four daily prompts) and red (less than two daily prompts). Figure 2 demonstrates the hypothesized navigation layers for the SMART-STEP application.
Development of webhosting
Further a web portal (SMART-STEP) was developed for synchronization of the data from the individual end-user SmPhs’. Figure 3 illustrates the different navigation panels adapted for the SmPh application and the synchronization with the web version for the primary investigator to monitor. The web version showed the compliance (intention to perform the exercise) of the end-user to the hourly prompts and the data was stored on the secure server of the developer with appropriate subscription for the investigators. Any bug fixation and the issues arising during alpha testing were resolved with reiteration and appropriate versions were released.
User testing
Alpha testing was carried out within the developing team for nearly two months prior to the SMART-STEP trial to assess the acceptability of user interface, any technical complaints including but not limiting battery drain, timing of the prompts, prompt loudness, video loops for exact time, hanging up of screen, network issues, compliance visualization and web synchronization. Members of the development team (two software developers, one community intervention behavioral scientist, two public health experts) were carrying the application installed SmPhs’ for several days together to understand the timing, pattern of prompts and technical concerns regarding video reminders, quality of the video and prompt beep sounds. Two alpha versions were developed after fixing bugs and improving video quality while retaining the resolution. Further beta testing in three typical office workers revealed video streaming difficulties and annoying prompt sounds. The bugs were again fixed, alarms were silenced and only vibrating notifications to the main screen were allowed. Three beta versions were developed during this reiteration period. The prompts synchronization to the web server discussed earlier was also tested at alpha level.
Implementation
After the development and successful alpha and beta level testing, SmPh-based intervention was implemented on a large scale as a cluster randomised controlled trial which is explained elsewhere [27, 28] and summarized below.
Participants
Desk-based office workers of fifteen administrative clusters of a large multifaceted university were contacted through appropriate advertisements in the university noticeboards and exchange users. To be eligible for participants should be of age 30–50 years, 8 h of full-time office work with computer interaction, spent atleast 60% of their workday in sitting and physically inactive (not meeting the weekly dose of > 150 min/week in MVPA). Exclusion criteria included the presence of chronic diseases, acute trauma, or pregnancy that could limit participation in physical activity. Individuals working night shifts or planning to change jobs during the trial period were also excluded. Furthermore, participants randomized to the SmPh-based reminders group were required to own an Android SmPh running version 5.0 or higher to facilitate the installation of the intervention application.
Cluster randomised controlled trial (SMART-STEP trial)
The study details and the baseline characteristics of the participants included in the SMART-STEP trial, have been reported earlier [5, 27, 28]. The administrative offices of 15 institutional clusters of an university were contacted for necessary approval to recruit their desk-based office workers satisfying the above eligible criteria. The clusters, which varied in size, were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups in ascending order based on the number of workers per cluster, resulting in approximately equal participant distribution across the SMART, TRADE, and CONT groups:
-
(1)
SMART group: Participants received the SMART-STEP application installed on their personal Android SmPh (devices were not provided), which delivered hourly reminders during office hours to reduce ST. Each reminder included a 2-min activity consisting of one stretching and one strengthening exercise (see Supplementary File S2). Upon responding to a notification, users’ application interactions were synced with a secure external server. Additionally, this group participated in a pedometer-based step challenge of 10,000 steps per day target, recording their daily step count in a logbook submitted every two weeks.
-
(2)
TRADE group: Participants received a workplace education manual outlining the risks of prolonged sitting, benefits of reducing ST, and practical strategies for increasing PA during and outside of work hours. They also maintained a daily log to record their walking time.
-
(3)
CONT group: Participants in this group continued their usual work routine for six months without engaging in any new physical activity intervention.
The design and details of the protocol can be accessed elsewhere [27]. At baseline, 1 st, 3rd and 6 th month follow up, body composition, cardiometabolic & musculoskeletal health measures along with work productivity were measured. Furthermore, seven-day ST/PA levels were measured by hip worn accelerometer (Actigraph wGT3X-BT) at baseline, 3rd and 6 th month, while biochemistry parameters were measured at baseline and at 6 th month. At the end of 6 months, a sub-group of participants who completed interventions (SMART, TRADE) were contacted for a qualitative interview about the barriers and enablers faced during the implementation of interventions at workplaces.
Evaluation of the interventions
Usability was assessed using the application usage data at periodic intervals, especially week wise of 24 weeks. As the office workers push the touch screen for seeing the notification in their mobile phone, this was recorded as the ‘intention to PA or reduce ST,’ synchronized to the external server based on the network of the client. The ‘intention’ or ‘usage’ data was downloaded from the password protected server every weekend for all the SMART group participants.
To assess compliance, we defined two key operational terms. “Non-attempted prompts” referred to daily ST/PA notifications delivered by the application that were not interacted with by the participant (i.e., the prompt was neither tapped nor acknowledged). “Non-compliant participants” were those whose overall engagement rate across the six-month intervention period fell below the predefined threshold of 70% (equivalent to responding to fewer than 580 out of 828 assigned prompts) as determined by application log data. This threshold was adapted from prior exercise science literature [46, 47].
Of ninety office workers (SMART n = 44, TRADE, n = 46) completed six months of SMART and TRADE interventions, 18 office workers (SMART n = 9, TRADE, n = 9) were purposefully selected based on compliance and were invited to participate in the study. Included participants should articulate their views on the interventions, addressing their experiences and challenges. The details of the process evaluation and the qualitative findings can be accessed in our previous published literature [34]. For the qualitative evaluation of the SmPh application implemented which is the objective of the present paper, only the data pertained to the SMART groups were presented in the paper. Specifically, nine office workers were selected, with five categorized as “compliant” (engaged more than 70% (580/828) of the prompts in six months) and four as ‘non-compliant’ (used the application irregularly or discontinued not meeting the threshold). 70% exercise attendance cutoff was adopted based on thresholds reported in previous physical activity literature [46, 47]. Compliance was determined based on application usage logs synced to the server, which recorded the frequency and duration of prompt interactions. This sampling approach ensured inclusion of diverse user experiences.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore potential barriers to application engagement. An interview guide was developed with signaling questions focusing on usability, convenience, and other contextual barriers related to the smartphone-based intervention. The final set of questions was collaboratively developed and approved by the three co-authors (CRR, AJP, and AA). Table 3 shows the questions asked during the interview, especially for the SmPh application users in SMART group. The original interview guide is provided as a supplementary file S2 in the recent publication [34].
Participants were interviewed in private areas within the vicinity of their workplace. All interviews were conducted by a trained researcher (BC) involved in the study. Participants were informed about the interviewer’s role in the research team at the beginning of the interview. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a deductive approach to categorize responses into constructs and sub-constructs based on the socio-ecological framework [34]. Data saturation was considered achieved when no new themes or insights emerged [48]. Qualitative data analysis was performed using Taguette, a web-based free and open-source coding tool and thematic analysis was undermined [34]. The identified themes were organized around three key levels influencing adherence to the SmPh-based sedentary time and physical activity (ST/PA) intervention: individual, interpersonal, and organizational, based on the socio-ecological model.
The following results section shows the findings: (i) the development process of the SmPh application, (ii) its implementation as a large-scale institutional trial, and (iii) the process evaluation findings from six months of intervention delivery.
Results
Smartphone application development
The development and pilot testing of the SMART STEP application took eight months (July 2020 – February 2021). Three versions of the application were developed with the final beta version SMART-STEP (version 3.0). Alpha testing revealed bugs (video crash, synchronization) and issues (video loop over, weekend alarms, battery drain) which were resolved prior to beta testing. At the final alpha testing, the SmPh application prompts were working well with no error in the periodic cues and synchronization with the PHP servers. The final version of the SmPh application consisted of six navigation layers: welcome page, login page, notification override, push button page, exercise prompt page and compliance page (even when participants did not open but have done the exercise, were able to log their compliance panel later). Figure 4 depicts the end-user interface panels with the navigation layers. The data was stored offline and synchronized with the central server (http://smartstep.mohammedalfaz.com/) and server was protected by username and password shared only with investigators (Fig. 5). On first time login, the participants were given liberty of changing the password. Unlike the contemporary workplace PA promotion SmPh applications available [49], the designed application did not ask for any access to Wi-Fi, camera, contacts and the files and the data security in private server was overseen by the application development company (Buildreams, Karkala, Karnataka, India, https://buildreamsgroup.com/).
Webhosting (PHP external server)
The developer designed four navigation panels for the administrator (primary author and co-authors access using username and password). The four navigation panels are as follows: (1) Dashboard providing overall summary of the log entry of the participants to view the prompts (compliance – daily, weekly and monthly displayed with the anonymous codes for participant identity); (2) Users: this page depicts the participants and demographic details; (3) Password: to reset the passwords for the clients who have formatted their phone at the middle of the trial; (4) View exercise data: this page consolidates the number of prompts in numeric form for the ease of data entry. The consolidated log can be downloaded as excel, csv and pdf by the authors. Figure 5 depicts the navigation panels; demographics of end-users and adherence monitor page. The cost incurred for SmPh application development (design, user testing) and private server (hosting, maintenance, report generation) for 16 months was translated to 1,860 USD which was considered a relatively low development cost compared to the typical operational budgets of medium- to large-sized organizations in India, particularly those in academic institutions and corporate information technology sectors, where digital infrastructure is already in place.
SMART group participants characteristics in the randomised trial
Of the 136 participants from 13 clusters who were randomized to the SMART (n = 44), TRADE (n = 46), and CONT (n = 46) groups, 84% of those in the SMART group (n = 37) completed the six-month trial along with all four follow-up assessments (baseline, first, third, and sixth month). Figure 6 illustrates the screening process and inclusion of SMART group participants in the trial.
Participants in the SMART group exhibited the following baseline characteristics: median age [35 years (IQR: 30.75–35)], years of work experience [8 years (IQR: 2.75–8)], and daily calorie intake [2736 kcal (IQR: 2565.75–2837)]. The majority were female [n = 26, 59%], held postgraduate qualifications [n = 31, 71%], and were engaged in administrative roles involving customer interaction [n = 31, 71%]. There were no significant baseline differences in accelerometer-measured ST and PA levels between the groups. Participants in the SMART group recorded an average of 686.74 min/day of ST, 255.59 min/day of LIPA and 17.69 min/day of MVPA. Detailed baseline characteristics of the other two behavioral arms (TRADE and CONT) are available in our recently published paper [28].
Usability of the application
In 24 weeks, a total of 828 SmPh prompts were delivered, with 138 prompts monthly excluding third Saturdays and Sundays (the University holidays). Mean attendance in response to prompts declined progressively over the six-month period: 77% (107 prompts) in the 1 st month, 59% (82 prompts) in the 2nd, 54% (74 prompts) in the 3rd, 45% (63 prompts) in the 4 th, 43% (59 prompts) in the 5 th, and 31% (43 prompts) in the 6 th month. Approximately half of the daily assigned breaks were not attempted. 34% of SMART group participants (n = 15/44) met the predefined threshold for sedentary break compliance. Weekly adherence to application prompts is illustrated in Fig. 7.
Process evaluation of the application
Of the nine SMART participants who completed the interview, all the participants accepted the simplicity and the potential to influence the movement behaviors (ST and PA) however, few concerns regarding the applications were (1) simple design of the application; (2) perceived workload; (3) colleagues’ vicinity; (4) organizational policies.
Simple and easy design
All the participants (n = 9) agreed to the simplicity of the design as it provided a goal setting.
“Smartphone reminders…. Not monotonous…… different exercise not repeating on the same day…. I liked the idea and did couple of times…..I missed few times” (P1, M, 46 years)
The simplicity in design itself becomes a barrier for continuing to comply with the prompts. Some of the respondents (n = 3/9, 33%) felt that the prompts were rigid without sensing their movements.
“I didn’t follow because it’s just an alarm…. that tells me what I must do” (P8, F, 42 years)
“Prompt is rigid… if I missed due to meetings and after resumed work, it does not sense……. When I want the prompt/clue was not there…. It should sense my sitting time…. Rather only rigid timing prompts….”. (P16, F, 44 years).
Workload
Majority of the respondents (n = 7/9, 78%) prioritize their work instead of health. Few (n = 2/9, 22%) did not use their mobile phones during their work.
“I immerse so much when I start work…. I ignore even calls…. These mobile notifications…...I ignore most……I want to complete my work assigned to me…. other things come next…” (P13, F, 37)
As the intervention was carried out in administrative offices of healthcare and technology education sectors which are primarily consumer based rather than true desk-based office work, few respondents (n = 2/9, 22%) felt these interventions are better integrated into software and information technology offices.
Colleagues’ vicinity/private space
The usage of SmPh applications increased among participants who had private space for their administrative work while those who have shared workspaces (n = 6/9, 67%) felt shy to do exercises in front of their colleagues.
“I am shy to do in front of others. It’s an open area you know…. When my cubicle is free…. Just me… I have done the exercises………” (P11, F, 34)
Some felt they were not able to attend the prompts or exercises during official meetings or while meeting deadlines. Few (n = 2/9, 22%) expressed the need for social support to sustain the behaviors in addition to the video reminders.
“there is no buddy or group in the app…. If people come together and share their success with colleagues…. Group dynamism…. Something like that… just a prompt…individual entity… It may not work…” (P16, F, 44).
Organizational policies
Majority of the participants (n = 7/9, 78%) felt the rigidity in the work and scheduled break policies.
“…. This is the work culture here………I knew few IT companies that allow their office workers to have recreational activities in between…. But here it is different and difficult…..” (P6, F, 39)
Flexibility in standing during meetings and brief interruptions in work was not a social norm. Few (n = 2/9, 22%) perceived the need of work culture that allows for active meetings, awareness of sedentary work and health benefits with brief interruptions to sedentary behavior.
“….. during meetings, it’s not a culture to even stand and I use to ignore the prompts…. I cannot stand and take notes, isn’t it?. Regular desks allow me only for sitting. It (organizational policies) is rigid here…..(P16, F, 44 years)
Moreover, gender disparities in family roles emerged as a notable barrier to engage with the SmPh application–based ST/PA video reminders, as revealed in our qualitative interviews.
“With my typing, listening to meeting tasks, I was already mentally exhausted. I reserve my physical energy for evening to prepare meals at night and looking after my younger daughter…. I need energy that I did not want to physically exhaust myself with exercises.” (P8, F, 42 years)
Discussion
The present study explored the development, usability and acceptability toward the customized SmPh application for SMART-STEP trial. The application was developed, and the activity was integrated into PHP server successfully. Although the application was developed based on contemporary research, the usage and acceptability of the SmPh prompts were found to be low, as several barriers emerged from our qualitative findings. Key barriers to optimize the SmPh based break reminders among Indian office workers included the lack of movement sensing, limited movement literacy among both employees and organizations, and the absence of a conducive environment and supportive social culture to promote PA and reduce ST in Indian workplace settings.
Experimental trials that have established favorable health benefits with SmPh-based PA interventions, have grounded strong behavioral theories such as feedback, goal setting, problem solving and social cognitive theories [33, 50]. A previous review has established that mobile health applications grounded in sound behavioral theory and incorporating techniques such as goal setting, feedback, motivational interviewing, and prompts for action are effective in promoting behavior change among office workers [49]. The SMART-STEP application was developed using individual-level behavior change theories specifically Self-Determination Theory and Feedback Intervention Theory, which supported autonomy, competence, and real-time feedback. However, despite this solid theoretical foundation, the intervention did not integrate broader social or environmental components, such as organizational support or policy-level facilitation. Prior literature indicates that the effectiveness and sustained usability of such interventions are enhanced when individual-level strategies are embedded within supportive organizational or ecological frameworks [51,52,53,54]. Thus, the relatively lower long-term engagement observed in our study may reflect the absence of these broader contextual supports. Future studies should consider integrating the SMART-STEP application within multilevel strategies to maximize effectiveness and usability.
Although participants appreciated the intuitive design, ease of navigation, and clarity of prompts, the static and non-personalized nature of the reminders contributed to perceptions of monotony and reduced novelty over time. This pattern of behavioral decay is well-documented in digital health literature [55, 56]. Incorporating context-aware features, such as movement sensing via embedded sensors, could allow for more tailored prompt delivery based on actual sedentary behavior rather than fixed schedules [56, 57]. Furthermore, incorporating strategies such as adding personalized feedback loops, gamification elements, and peer-support features (e.g., leaderboards, social challenges) may enhance user engagement and motivation [58, 59].
Significant reduction in SmPh logs were evident weekly. Majority of the prompts went unattended. This behavioral decay was commonly evident in workplace intervention studies due to several perceived barriers [60]. One potential reason is that our study involved sedentary workers of offices which intensively involved consumer interactions rather than computer interactions alone. Further the office workers involved in heterogenous administrative work (financial transaction, consumer help, designing) which might have influenced the perception of interrupting ST in workplaces. Nevertheless, social theories mapping, material reward, motivation and sensing ability using accelerometers or pressure sensors might have been the significant contributors to the poor engagement with the application [49, 55]. Further lack of awareness of activity literacy, lack of PA interruptions as a social culture in Indian workspaces were also speculated to be the barriers for the effective engagement with the digital interventions for workplace PA promotion [61]. Significant cultural variability, lack of awareness and perception about PA in the workplace was evident during the unstructured review where the participants expressed the opinion that occupational activity and leisure time PA could never be combined as the former may influence the routine work. Appropriate educational strategies to create awareness on need of such behavioral strategies at the workplace should be implemented before designing similar applications to increase motor behaviors in the workplaces of low-resource settings [13, 62].
While the development cost of the SMART-STEP application (USD 1,860 for 16 months) is relatively low for medium- to large-sized organizations, we acknowledge that smaller or resource-constrained workplaces particularly in public or non-profit sectors may face budgetary limitations. In such contexts, collaborative funding models, institutional cost-sharing, or integration with existing workplace wellness programs may help mitigate financial barriers and improve scalability [63]. Further, we recommend the SmPh-based reminders should be used as a part of multicomponent interventions in combination with other strategies such as workplace ST/PA counselling [13], installing active stations and workplace champions training may improve the adherence to workplace PA and ST interventions.
Although this study was conducted in the administrative settings of a university, the findings have important implications for broader non-academic and non-healthcare workspaces particularly in information technology (IT) and other corporate sectors where computer-based tasks dominate over consumer interaction, and employees often spend over 70% of their time in prolonged sitting bouts [64]. SmPh-based interventions may be especially relevant in corporate environments, where Android SmPh penetration is high and application based task management is already well integrated into daily workflows [65]. Additionally, digital tools grounded in individual behavior change models, such as our SMART-STEP application, offer scalable, low-cost solutions that require minimal logistical support in such contexts. Corporate offices may also allow greater flexibility in modifying physical environments (adoption of standing desks, flexible work hours, and active meetings) compared to academic institutions [66]. Integrating the SMART-STEP application with these supportive environmental and policy-level modifications could further enhance user engagement and adherence in corporate settings.
Strength and limitations
To the best of our knowledge, the application development is first of its kind to reduce ST and increase PA at the same time among sedentary office workers in India. Further the SmPh application was developed at a low cost which is affordable and easy to implement among sedentary workspaces of low-resource settings. Our research may open avenues for new technology-based interventions to reduce ST and increase PA in densely populated country like India where the chronic disease risk is high. Besides strengths, few limitations of the study are (1) the application employed in the present study was grounded on individual theory (self-determination and feedback intervention) whereas recent studies which have employed social theories (social cognitive and social ecological models) reported significant success in reducing workplace ST and improving PA [67]; (2) the application lacked personalized messages or sensor based support which might have reduced the motivation in engaging in long term [56]; (3) As noted earlier, this study was conducted exclusively among university office workers. Therefore, the qualitative findings may not be generalizable to more heterogeneous populations, such as those in non-academic, non-university, or corporate settings. Future research should consider including diverse occupational groups to enhance the applicability and transferability of the results [28]; (4) Additionally, the qualitative interviews were conducted with a small sample of self-selected participants which may limit the generalizability of perceptions and experiences. Inclusion of large sample may have been provided [34]; (5) Although we included both compliant and non-compliant users, individuals who agreed to be interviewed may differ in their motivation or perceptions from those who declined participation [68]; This potential selection bias could have influenced the feedback on usability and acceptability; (6) Since the interviewer was part of the research team, participants may have provided socially desirable responses, which could have introduced response bias; (7) Although this study followed the mHealth Evidence Reporting and Assessment (mERA) checklist to assess feasibility, the absence of a complementary validated quantitative feasibility assessment tool (e.g., Feasibility of Intervention Measure) is acknowledged as a limitation; (8) Although we administered seven-day accelerometer-based physical activity measurements at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months [28], these measures did not fully capture self-reported compliance with the SmPh application prompts. Future trials should consider integrating accelerometer data with SMART-STEP application usage metrics to provide a more comprehensive understanding of user compliance among office workers.
Conclusions
SMART-STEP application was developed at a low cost, that can be adapted in low-resource settings. The usability and acceptability decay after nine weeks of usage strongly emphasize that technology based behavioral intervention may be interesting & seem convenient in the short-term. However, to increase the adherence in the long term, the application-based prompts should be used in combination with counselling and environmental modification strategies.
Data availability
Data extraction sheet will be made available based on a reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chastin SFM, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM, Participants STCP. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):75.
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62.
Pinto AJ, Bergouignan A, Dempsey PC, Roschel H, Owen N, Gualano B, Dunstan DW. Physiology of sedentary behavior. Physiol Rev. 2023;103(4):2561–622.
Wallmann-Sperlich B, Düking P, Müller M, Froböse I, Sperlich B. Type and intensity distribution of structured and incidental lifestyle physical activity of students and office workers: a retrospective content analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):634.
Chandrasekaran B, Arumugam A, Pesola AJ, Davis F, Rao CR. Association of accelerometer-measured sedentary time, light intensity physical activity levels with cardiometabolic disease risk in Indian office workers: insights from the SMART-STEP study. Obesity Medicine. 2023;44:100520.
Heiland EG, Ekblom Ö, Bojsen-Møller E, Larisch LM, Blom V, Ekblom MM. Bi-directional, day-to-day associations between objectively-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep among office workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):7999.
Prince SA, Elliott CG, Scott K, Visintini S, Reed JL. Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):30.
Park S, Lee S, Woo S, Webster-Dekker K, Chen W, Veliz P, Larson JL. Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of the working population measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2123.
Buffey AJ, Herring MP, Langley CK, Donnelly AE, Carson BP. The acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting time in adults with standing and light-intensity walking on biomarkers of cardiometabolic health in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2022;52(8):1765–87.
Gust A. Effect of health conditions and community program participation on physical activity and exercise motivation in older adults. J Health Psychol. 2024;30(6):1364–76.
Lee I, Powell K, Sarmiento O, Hallal P. Even a small dose of physical activity can be good medicine. Nat Med. 2025;31(2):376–8.
Biddle GJH, Sanders JP, Gokal K, Madigan CD, Thomas JJC, Pyle A, Roalfe A, Daley AJ, Team CAAS. A Christmas themed physical activity intervention to increase participation in physical activity during Advent: pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2022;379:e072807.
Patel AK, Banga C, Chandrasekaran B. Effect of an education-based workplace intervention (move in office with education) on sedentary behaviour and well-being in desk-based workers: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28(3):1655–63.
Chu AH, Ng SH, Tan CS, Win AM, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of workplace intervention strategies to reduce sedentary time in white-collar workers. Obes Rev. 2016;17(5):467–81.
Stephenson A, McDonough SM, Murphy MH, Nugent CD, Mair JL. Using computer, mobile and wearable technology enhanced interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):105.
Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89–112.
Akinosun AS, Polson R, Diaz-Skeete Y, De Kock JH, Carragher L, Leslie S, Grindle M, Gorely T. Digital Technology Interventions for Risk Factor Modification in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(3):e21061.
Buckingham SA, Williams AJ, Morrissey K, Price L, Harrison J. Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a systematic review. Digit Health. 2019;5:2055207619839883.
Parés-Salomón I, Señé-Mir AM, Martín-Bozas F, Loef B, Coffey A, Dowd KP, Jabardo-Camprubí G, Proper KI, Puig-Ribera A, Bort-Roig J. Effectiveness of workplace interventions with digital elements to reduce sedentary behaviours in office employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024;21(1):41.
The Mobile Economy. 2025. https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-economy/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/030325-The-Mobile-Economy-2025.pdf.
Agrawal R. India connected: How the smartphone is transforming the world's largest democracy: Oxford University Press. 2018.
Masaebi F, Salehi M, Kazemi M, Vahabi N, Azizmohammad Looha M, Zayeri F. Trend analysis of disability adjusted life years due to cardiovascular diseases: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1268.
Ramamoorthy T, Kulothungan V, Mathur P. Prevalence and correlates of insufficient physical activity among adults aged 18–69 years in india: findings from the national noncommunicable disease monitoring survey. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19(3):150–9.
Gudi N, Yadav U, John O, Webster R. Challenges and opportunities in employing digital health to address self-management needs of people with NCDs in India. Bmj Innovations. 2023;9(1):19–22.
Thakar V, Kamalakannan S, Prakash V. Effectiveness of m-health technology-enabled physical activity program on physical activity adoption and adherence in people with hypertension in India: A randomized controlled trial protocol. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2024;10(2):92–101.
Ranjani H, Avari P, Nitika S, Jagannathan N, Oliver N, Valabhji J, Mohan V, Chambers J, Anjana R. Effectiveness of mobile health applications for cardiometabolic risk reduction in urban and rural india: a pilot, randomized controlled study. J Diab Sci Technol. 2025:19322968241310861. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/19322968241310861. Advance online publication.
Chandrasekaran B, Rao CR, Davis F, Arumugam A. SMART STEP - SMARTphone-driven exercise and pedometer-based STEP intervention to promote physical activity among desk-based employees: Study protocol for a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial. Work. 2021;69(4):1229–45.
Chandrasekaran B, Rao CR, Pesola AJ, Arumugam A. Effectiveness of technology-assisted and self-directed interventions to sit less and move more among Indian desk-based office workers: A three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (SMART-STEP trial). Appl Ergon. 2025;127:104528.
Swartz AM, Rote AE, Welch WA, Maeda H, Hart TL, Cho YI, Strath SJ. Prompts to disrupt sitting time and increase physical activity at work, 2011–2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E73.
Larouche ML, Mullane SL, Toledo MJL, Pereira MA, Huberty JL, Ainsworth BE, Buman MP. Using point-of-choice prompts to reduce sedentary behavior in sit-stand workstation users. Front Public Health. 2018;6:323.
Haque MS, Kangas M, Jamsa T. A persuasive mhealth behavioral change intervention for promoting physical activity in the workplace: feasibility randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e15083.
Stritch JM, Jensen UT, Allgood M. Self-determination theory and public employee motivation research. In: Research Handbook on Motivation in Public Administration. edn.: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2022: 57–70.
Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara R, Shariful Islam SM, Dunstan D, McVicar J, Abdelrazek M, Maddison R. Smartphone-based interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and promote physical activity using integrated dynamic models: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e26315.
Chandrasekaran B, Arumugam A, Pesola AJ, Rao CR. “Balancing work and movement”: barriers and enablers for being physically active at Indian workplaces – findings from SMART STEP trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024;21(1):110.
Chandrasekaran B, Arumugam A, Pesola AJ, Davis F, Rao CR. Association of accelerometer measured sedentary behavior patterns with cognitive functions in sedentary office workers: Insights from SMART-STEP study. Work (Reading, Mass). 2024;79(4):2045–58.
Agarwal S, LeFevre AE, Lee J, L’Engle K, Mehl G, Sinha C, Labrique A. Group WmTER: Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ. 2016;352:i1174.
Association WM. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(3):206–8.
Sjøgaard G, Justesen JB, Murray M, Dalager T, Søgaard K. A conceptual model for worksite intelligent physical exercise training–IPET–intervention for decreasing life style health risk indicators among employees: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:652.
Mailey EL, Rosenkranz SK, Casey K, Swank A. Comparing the effects of two different break strategies on occupational sedentary behavior in a real world setting: A randomized trial. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:423–8.
Morris AS, Mackintosh KA, Owen N, Dempsey PC, Dunstan DW, McNarry MA. Rise and recharge: exploring employee perceptions of and contextual factors influencing an individual-level e-health smartphone intervention to reduce office workers’ sedentary time at work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18):9627.
Bond DS, Thomas JG, Raynor HA, Moon J, Sieling J, Trautvetter J, Leblond T, Wing RR. B-MOBILE–a smartphone-based intervention to reduce sedentary time in overweight/obese individuals: a within-subjects experimental trial. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100821.
Morris AS, Mackintosh KA, Dunstan D, Owen N, Dempsey P, Pennington T, McNarry MA. Rise and recharge: Effects on activity outcomes of an e-health smartphone intervention to reduce office workers’ sitting time. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):1–18.
Tersa-Miralles C, Bravo C, Bellon F, Pastells-Peiró R, Rubinat Arnaldo E, Rubí-Carnacea F. Effectiveness of workplace exercise interventions in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in office workers: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e054288.
Sujata J, Yatin J, Abhijit C, Noopur S, Ruchi D. Factors affecting smartphone purchase among Indian youth: A descriptive analysis. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9(15):1–10.
Vikram K, Ramanathan KV. A study on smartphone industry and their effects on Indian market an over view. Asia Pac J Res. 2015;1(25):163–6.
MacDonald CS, Ried-Larsen M, Soleimani J, Alsawas M, Lieberman DE, Ismail AS, Serafim LP, Yang T, Prokop L, Joyner M, et al. A systematic review of adherence to physical activity interventions in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021;37(8):e3444.
Bucciarelli V, Bianco F, Mucedola F, Di Blasio A, Izzicupo P, Tuosto D, Ghinassi B, Bucci I, Napolitano G, Di Baldassarre A, et al. Effect of adherence to physical exercise on cardiometabolic profile in postmenopausal women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):656.
Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exercise Health. 2021;13(2):201–16.
Chandrasekaran B, Kundapur PP, Rao CR. Are free workplace health promotion apps adequately mapped with behavior change theories, techniques and desired features? A content analysis Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(8):1507–16.
Ramírez AS, Ayala GX, Murillo M, Glik DC, Guerrero AD. Integrating theory with a user-centered design approach to maximize mHealth acceptability and usability. Health Educ Behav. 2025;8:10901981241311232.
Maylor BD, Edwardson CL, Zakrzewski-Fruer JK, Champion RB, Bailey DP. Efficacy of a multicomponent intervention to reduce workplace sitting time in office workers: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(9):787–95.
Edwardson CL, Maylor BD, Biddle SJ, Clemes SA, Cox E, Davies MJ, Dunstan DW, Eborall H, Granat MH, Gray LJ, et al. A multicomponent intervention to reduce daily sitting time in office workers: the SMART Work & Life three-arm cluster RCT. Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023;11(6):1–229.
Brierley ML, Chater AM, Smith LR, Bailey DP. The Effectiveness of sedentary behaviour reduction workplace interventions on cardiometabolic risk markers: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(11):1739–67.
Zhou L, Deng X, Guo K, Hou L, Hui X, Wu Y, Xu M, Wang Y, Liang S, Yang K, et al. Effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in office-based workers to mitigate occupational sedentary behavior: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023;9:e44745.
Direito A, Walsh D, Hinbarji M, Albatal R, Tooley M, Whittaker R, Maddison R. Using the intervention mapping and behavioral intervention technology frameworks: development of an mhealth intervention for physical activity and sedentary behavior change. Health Educ Behav. 2018;45(3):331–48.
Bort-Roig J, Chirveches-Pérez E, Garcia-Cuyàs F, Dowd KP, Puig-Ribera A. Monitoring occupational sitting, standing, and stepping in office employees with the W@W-app and the metawearc sensor: validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(8):e15338.
Huang Y, Benford S, Price D, Patel R, Li B, Ivanov A, Blake H. using internet of things to reduce office workers’ sedentary behavior: intervention development applying the behavior change wheel and human-centered design approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(7):e17914.
Mamede A, Noordzij G, Jongerling J, Snijders M, Schop-Etman A, Denktas S. Combining web-based gamification and physical nudges with an app (MoveMore) to promote walking breaks and reduce sedentary behavior of office workers: Field study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e19875.
Hartin PJ, Nugent CD, McClean SI, Cleland I, Tschanz JT, Clark CJ, Norton MC. The empowering role of mobile apps in behavior change interventions: the gray matters randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(3):e93.
van der Zee MD, van der Mee D, Bartels M, de Geus EJC. Tracking of voluntary exercise behaviour over the lifespan. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):17.
Fernandes S, Hinckson E, Richards J. Qualitative insights on the importance of sociocultural contexts on asian indian migrant participation in physical activity and sedentary behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2023;20(11):1051–7.
Shrestha N, Pedisic Z, Jurakic D, Biddle SJH, Parker A. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour counselling: Attitudes and practices of mental health professionals. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254684.
Badaracco C, Durak E, Ward-Ritacco C, Ribley D. Compensation for exercise professional services. Acsms Health & Fitness Journal. 2024;28(5):53–60.
Bongers N, Healy G, Thomas G, Clark B. Device-based measurement of office-based physical activity and sedentary time: a systematic review. J Measurement Physical Behav. 2024;7(1):10–22.
Simmonds D, Guha S, Rahim N, Mella-Barahona J. Decision-making on the go: Smartphones and decision-making in early 21st-century workflow. Bus Inf Rev. 2019;36(4):164–77.
Cooke H, Fiorentino S, Harris R, Livingstone N, McAllister P. Corporate occupiers’ attitude to <i>flex space</i> in the post-Covid environment. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 2022;40(5):493–507.
van Kasteren YF, Lewis LK, Maeder A. Office-based physical activity: mapping a social ecological model approach against COM-B. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):163.
Westland H, Vervoort S, Kars M, Jaarsma T. Interviewing people on sensitive topics: challenges and strategies. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2025;24(3):488–93.
Acknowledgements
Authors wish to thank Manipal Academy of Higher Education for providing conducive research environment and supporting us the publishing support.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal The primary author has received partial funding support from the Indian Association of Physiotherapist to develop the smartphone application for the present cluster randomized controlled trial. The funders have no role or influence in the results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Baskaran Chandrasekaran conducted the research, administered the data analysis and wrote the initial draft; Ashokan Arumugam supervised and provided critical inputs; Arto J Pesola provided critical inputs and reviewed the manuscript. Poornima Panduranga Kundapur written the code for the smartphone application and reviewed the manuscript; Chythra R Rao conceived the idea and supervised the research work; All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC:749/2019) approved the study, and the study was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/03/024138) on 20/03/2020. All the participants were given written informed consent for participation and publishing the study.
Consent to publication
Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants to publish.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chandrasekaran, B., Arumugam, A., Pesola, A.J. et al. Development, implementation and evaluation of a smartphone application aimed to reduce sedentary time and increase physical activity among Indian sedentary office workers – findings from SMART-STEP trial. BMC Public Health 25, 1806 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12889-025-23049-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12889-025-23049-9