- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Preliminary evaluation of a gamified smartphone intervention (O2O-PEP) for enhancing HIV post-exposure prophylaxis uptake in men who have sex with men: pilot feasibility study
BMC Public Health volume 25, Article number: 1539 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Addressing the burden of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) has become a major priority. Over the years, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has proven efficacy in preventing HIV transmission. However, the widespread underutilization of PEP undermines its protective potential. To address this issue, we developed an innovative, gamified mini-app embedded in WeChat, known as O2O-PEP (online-to-offline collaborative model for HIV postexposure prophylaxis), that targets PEP uptake.
Objective
We aimed to conduct a pilot feasibility study to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of O2O-PEP in promoting PEP uptake among Chinese MSM.
Methods
A single-arm, pre-post feasibility study combing quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection was performed in Qingdao, China. Eligible MSM were invited to use the O2O-PEP for 2 weeks. The mini-app provides an online-to-offline service model, enabling MSM to access PEP-related character-based narratives, share on moments, sexual transmitted disease picture test quizzes, e-Consultation, and referrals to offline PEP service providers. Additionally, gamification features, such as reward-based engagement and social support, are incorporated to enhance user motivation. Intervention feasibility was tested by looking at participant engagement data. The acceptability of the intervention was explored with System Usability Scale (SUS) and in-depth interviews. Preliminary efficacy was measured by assessing HIV PEP knowledge and HIV PEP uptake.
Results
A total of twenty Chinese MSM were successfully enrolled. All participants completed baseline outcome measures, and 19 (19/20, 95%) completed outcome measures at 2 weeks. Participants had a mean age of 29.65 years (SD 9.17). PEP knowledge scores increased from 7.79 (SD 1.69) at baseline to 9.68 (SD 2.86) at the two-week follow-up, reflecting a large Cohen’s d effect size of 0.8. One participant successfully accessed PEP within 12 h after engaging in condomless anal sex with a stranger during the intervention period. On average, participants spent 35.84 min using the mini-app over a two-week period, though app usage declined over the study period. Acceptability ratings ranged from moderate to extreme across several dimensions, including satisfaction, usability, recommendation of the mini-app to others, and user-friendliness. Ratings for the difficulty of using O2O-PEP was somewhat lower. Regarding the SUS score, 89.5% of participants rated the mini-app within the acceptable usability range (≥ 50), indicating that the majority found the mini-app to be user-friendly. Qualitative analysis of follow-up assessments identified areas where O2O-PEP needed to be improved to enhance user engagement, including a desire to additional functions of psychological and sexual transmitted diseases counseling.
Conclusions
This study pioneers the application of gamification to PEP uptake, demonstrating the feasibility and acceptability of O2O-PEP. A further efficacy trial is currently underway.
Trial registration
This study was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200062538) on 11 Augst, 2022.
Introduction
Men who have sex with men (MSM) constitute the demographic most severely affected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) globally [1]. Between 2010 and 2022, HIV infection rates amongst MSM has increased by 25% [2], with an HIV prevalence of 8.5% in 2023, which is 9.6 times higher than that in the general population [3]. In China, MSM faced an HIV prevalence of approximately 8% over the past five years [4], a significantly higher rate compared to other high-incidence key groups. Addressing this persistent HIV epidemic necessitates innovative HIV prevention strategies tailored to the unique needs of MSM, such as the needs for MSM-friendly sexual health services.
A series of new tools complementary to the use of condoms have been introduced for comprehensive prevention with emphasis on biomedical prophylaxis, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). PrEP is increasing in the world, but not reaching all populations at risk, for example, the proportion of PrEP usage among Chinese MSM in 2021 was only 18% [5], thus additional preventions are still needed. HIV PEP has demonstrated high efficacy in preventing HIV infection following a recent exposure [6, 7] and has been widely adopted in numerous countries [8, 9]. The guidelines from the World Health Organization recommended people with suspected or unknown exposure to HIV take PEP as early as possible, ideally within 24 h but no later than 72 h [10]. However, PEP remains underutilized as an HIV prevention strategy in China. Chinese Center for Disease prevention and Control (Chinese CDC) released its first guideline for HIV PEP in October 2020. The guideline delineated the criteria for PEP eligibility, which are as follows: individuals should test negative for HIV, the exposure should have occurred within the preceding 72 h; there should be an assessed high risk of acquiring HIV post-behavioral evaluation, and individuals should consent to adhere to the PEP regime and subsequent follow-up procedures [11]. Despite strong interest, studies consistently showed low PEP uptake among Chinese MSM [12,13,14]. Factors hindering PEP scale-up include low awareness of HIV infection risks and concerns among HIV healthcare providers that PEP availability may encourage high-risk behaviors or contribute to HIV drug resistance among MSM [12, 15]. PEP’s limited accessibility, with challenges such as waiting times in offline designated hospitals for HIV treatment, part-time medical staff providing PEP services, and the absence of specialized PEP service center, exacerbate the demand-supply conflict [16]. Therefore, exploring alternative PEP delivery models is imperative.
With the widespread usage of smartphones globally, MSM have shown high engagement with mobile technology, particularly for health-information seeking, dating, and mobile health (mHealth) interventions. This highlights the potential of mHealth as a scalable, cost-effective, and user-friendly approach to health service delivery [17]. In December 2021, the Chinese expert consensus on HIV-related medical services by online health platforms provided a foundation for collaboration between researchers and app developers [18]. This collaboration aimed to integrate innovative elements, including gamification, into apps to reduce risks of acquiring HIV among MSM. Gamification involves applying game components (e.g., leaderboards, gaining points, and badges) to nongame contexts, leveraging the motivational power of health behaviors within an engaging framework [19]. While previous studies have explored gamification in promoting desired health behaviors, such as physical activity and cognition training [20, 21], our literature review as of January 2024 found no randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate the effect of the gamified digital intervention on PEP uptake [22]. Most of the current studies explored the status of PEP uptake and its associated factors among MSM [14]. In 2017, Chinese CDC piloted a project to explore a digital intervention combing HIV self-risk assessment with online medication supply, but its impact on PEP uptake was still uncertain [23]. To bridge this gap, we have developed a smartphone intervention, initially as a WeChat mini-app named “O2O-PEP” (online-to-offline collaborative model for HIV postexposure prophylaxis) [24], incorporating gamification components to enhance PEP uptake. In brief, O2O-PEP includes several features, which mainly include (1) PEP related medication aide, directing participants to an online health platform “HeHealth” or an offline designated hospital capable of offering PEP; (2) Share on Moments, which provided a platform for asynchronous peer-to-peer interaction and social connectivity; (3) Character-based narratives; (4) Sexual transmitted diseases’ (STDs) quiz; and (5) E-counseling. An efficacy study is currently underway to evaluate the impact of O2O-PEP in promoting HIV PEP uptake among Chinese MSM. Prior to this, we conducted this feasibility study using a single arm, pre-post feasibility study design to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of O2O-PEP over a two-week period. This feasibility study aimed to collect user feedback to refine the prototype and inform future real-world scale-up efforts. We hypothesized that O2O-PEP would be acceptable, feasible, and demonstrate preliminary efficacy.
Methods
Study design
A single-arm, pre-post feasibility study combing quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection was performed in Qingdao, China, to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention [25]. The city Qingdao was selected for our study setting as our previous survey has found the proportion of PEP usage among MSM in Qingdao was still very low [26], which would contextualize the need for this intervention. This study was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200062538) on 11 Augst, 2022, and the study protocol was previously published [24].
Ethical considerations
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the institutional review board of Binzhou Medical University (IRB# 2021-007). Our study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was retrieved from all study participants upon enrollment in the study. Data were deidentified before analysis. No additional compensation was provided for participants.
Participants
Participants were recruited through online and offline advertisements, as well as staff recommendation from a local community-based organization (CBO), between May and June 2023. To ensure sample diversity, participants were purposively enrolled from both age groups (under 30 and 30 or older) and included individuals with and without previous experience with digital interventions. Additionally, we intentionally recruited individuals familiar with CBO staff, such as those who have previously attended events organized by the CBO. This criterion was included to ensure participants felt a sense of safety and were well-equipped to provide enrich information regarding the use of O2O-PEP mini-app. Potential participants underwent assessment by CBO staff through phone or in-person interactions. Those expressing interest provided signed informed consent and underwent eligibility confirmation before enrollment. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age 18 years or older, (2) assigned male at birth, (3) self-reported engagement in anal or oral sex with men, (4) HIV-negative status, (5) no pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use within one week before enrollment, (6) ownership of an iOS or Android smartphone compatible with the O2O-PEP mini-app, (7) residency in Qingdao, and (8) proficiency in Chinese. Exclusion criteria included a history of medical or psychiatric conditions that could interfere with study participation. We would stop recruit participants based on data saturation through ongoing discussions of interviews, and we finally recruited 20 MSM, this is consistent with research which showed saturation is reached with about 12 interviews [27, 28].
Pilot test procedures
Collaborating with the local CBO, we integrated the O2O-PEP mini-app into an existing WeChat public account (Qingdao Qingtong Anti-HIV/AIDS Volunteer Service Center) to enhance its acceptability, scalability, and potential for widespread implementation. The CBO was selected based on its extensive experience serving MSM since 2015, and its prior involvement in research projects also facilitated smooth collaboration with the study. CBO staff provided a demonstration of the app’s functions and operations to participants. To restrict access to O2O-PEP to eligible study participants, a unique PIN was provided. After entering the PIN, participants completed the electronic informed consent for study participation, and underwent a baseline assessment. Subsequently, participants navigated to the O2O-PEP home screen, featuring six key function icons targeting PEP uptake: my profile page, share on moments, character-based narratives, STDs picture choice quizzes, medication aide, and e-consultation. Table 1 lists detailed intervention components within each function icon. Figure 1 presents a screenshot example of the O2O-PEP mini-app.
Participants were allocated a 2-week period to engage with the mini-app, with strong encouragement to utilize it on a daily basis. This 2-week period duration allowed participants to interact with various app features and identify any significant usability issues, while maintaining a focus on short-term usability rather than long-term engagement. Throughout this duration, participants were not only given the flexibility to communicate with CBO staff and researchers at any time but were actively encouraged to do so. Upon the conclusion of the 2-week pilot trial, all participants were invited to participate in a posttest computer-assisted self-interview survey. Additionally, they took part in a qualitative exit interview conducted online through licensed videoconferencing software (Tencent meeting).
As an incentive for engagement, participants received rewards in the form of points and game cards for specific activities carried out within the mini-app. These activities included earning 1 point for each login and check-in, 2 points for watching one story, and 2 points for creating a post or leaving a comment in the Share on Moments section. Furthermore, participants had the option to redeem their accumulated points and game cards for in-kind goods such as lubricant or JD Ecards which are similar with the Amazon gift cards.
Assessments
Our study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the O2O-PEP intervention. Specifically, feasibility was assessed through participant engagement data on O2O-PEP, while acceptability was assessed by a 4-Likert point intervention acceptance scale, SUS score, and an in-depth review. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated based on PEP knowledge scores and uptake of PEP during the two-week follow-up visit.
Participant characteristics
Baseline and follow-up assessments were self-administered through a Web-based survey. Upon securing informed consent, participant information was collected, including demographics (age, marital status, education, personal monthly income, etc.), and potential confounders, such as sexual risk behaviors, self-perceived risk of acquiring HIV, MSM-related stigma, PEP and PrEP usage history, and psychiatric information [31, 32]. The 8-item HIV RISK Assessment tool for MSM, recommended by Chinese CDC, was administered to assess risk of acquiring HIV over the past 6 months [33, 34]. The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 15, with participants scoring less than 5 classified as “low risk of acquiring HIV” and those scoring 5 or higher categorized as “high risk of acquiring HIV”. MSM-related stigma was assessed using the Neilands’ homosexual stigma scale, which consists of 10 items, each scored on a scale from 0 (never) to 3 (many times), with higher score indicating a greater level of stigma [35]. The severity of depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks was assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the total score for this scale ranges from 0 to 27, with higher score reflecting greater severity of depression [36]. Overall, the baseline assessment would take 10–15 min to complete.
Feasibility of the O2O-PEP mini-app
To assess feasibility, user statistics of various app features were collected in a secure web-based cloud environment (Amazon Web Service). This included the average time spent using the mini-app, daily check-ins over the 2-week period, frequency of use of different intervention components, and the number of posts and comments in the Share on Moment section.
Acceptability of the O2O-PEP mini-app
Acceptability was assessed by five questions we adopted from previous studies [37]: what was your overall satisfaction with O2O-PEP? How usable was O2O-PEP on a daily basis? How difficult was it to learn how to use O2O-PEP? would you recommend O2O-PEP to a friend who would need it? How user-friendly was O2O-PEP? employing a Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to assess the usability of the mini-app. Participants rated 10 items on a 5-point Likert scale (from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree”). For positively worded items, scores were calculated by subtracting 1 from the raw score. For negatively worded items, scores were calculated by subtracting the raw score from 5. The scores for each item were summed, and the total score was multiplied by 2.5 to calculate the final SUS score, which ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived usability, with scores above 50 considered acceptable [38]. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews with MSM were conducted online to qualitatively analyze their experiences and perceptions of O2O-PEP. Interview questions covered topics such as liked or disliked features, factors influencing daily use, suggested improvements or additions, and the likelihood of future use. The interview questions can be found in Multimedia Appendix 3. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim with participants’ consent.
Preliminary efficacy
PEP knowledge was assessed using a 11-item PEP knowledge scale at both baseline and follow-up visits [39]. The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 11, with a higher score reflecting greater level of PEP knowledge. Information regarding PEP uptake was collected during the follow up.
Data analysis
Descriptive statistical analysis was employed to portray participant socio-demographics, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy. Means and standard deviation (M, SD) were calculated for continuous variables, while frequencies (proportions, %) were determined for categorical variables. Specifically, intervention acceptability was evaluated through two approaches. First, individual responses to acceptability questions (satisfaction, usability, difficulty, willingness to recommend, and user-friendliness) were descriptively analyzed. Second, SUS scores equal to or exceeding 50 were considered acceptable. For qualitative interview data, participant comments were systematically summarized and examined for themes related to mini-app functions. Two researchers utilized an open coding approach to categorize and analyze the data. Relevant quotes for each theme were included in the manuscript. For the assessment of preliminary efficacy, the PEP knowledge score was compared between baseline and the two-week follow-up visit. Cohen’s d was used to quantify the effect size between the two time points. Cohen’s d is calculated as the difference between the means of PEP knowledge scores of the two time points divided by the pooled standard deviation:
Where M1 and M2 represent the means of PEP knowledge score at baseline and the two-week follow-up, respectively, and SDpooled is the pooled standard deviation. According to Cohen’s guidelines, an effect size of 0.2 is considered small, 0.5 represents a medium effect size, and 0.8 or higher indicates a large effect size [40]. Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Corp., WA, USA) facilitated data management and analysis throughout the study.
Results
Study population characteristics
A total of 20 participants were successfully enrolled during the index visit. Baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 2. The participants had a mean age of 29.65 years (SD 9.17, range: 20 to 53 years), and the majority identified as single (95%, 19/20). About 55% (11/20) had completed at least a college level education, while 80% (16/20) had undergone HIV self-testing, and 90% (18/20) had received facility-based testing in the past year. A significant portion of participants had their sexual debut with a man at less than 19 years old (30%, 6/20), and 85% (17/20) perceived themselves as having no or low risk of acquiring HIV. The sample retention rate was 95% (19/20) at the conclusion of the two-week period. One participant was lost to follow-up due to refusal to participate in the review.
Preliminary efficacy
The mean PEP knowledge score exhibited a significant increase from 7.79 (SD 1.69) at baseline to 9.68 (SD 2.86) at the two-week follow-up visit. This change demonstrated a large effect size with a Cohen’s d of 0.80. Notably, the proportion of participants correctly answering the item “A person does not need to take PEP after having unprotected sex with people with unknown HIV status” increased from 75% (15/20) to 89% (17/19). Importantly, one participant successfully obtained PEP from the online health platform HeHealth within 12 h after engaging in condomless anal sex with a stranger.
Feasibility
Over a two-week follow-up period, the mean total time spent using the mini-app was 35.84 min, ranging from 10 to 61 min. Participants engaged with the app for an average of 7 days, and the number of check-ins displayed a decline over the pilot trial duration (Fig. 2). A total of 45 posts were made in the Share on Moments section, averaging 3.21 posts per day, with 47% (9/19) of participants contributing at least one post during the pilot. The mean number of clicks on “narrative-based characters” and “STDs picture choice quizzes” per participant was 2.32 (SD 1.67) and 1.37 (SD 1.01), respectively. Notably, 9 participants continued to use the mini-app beyond the two-week pilot trial period.
Acceptability
In Table 3, participants’ acceptability responses for the O2O-PEP mini-app are summarized. The average level of acceptability varied from moderate to extreme for aspects such as intervention satisfaction, usability, recommendation of the mini-app to others, and user-friendliness. Assessing the difficulty of using O2O-PEP, the average rating fell within the “somewhat” range.
In Table 4, participants’ acceptability for SUS scores are summarized. The total mean score was 60.26 (12.35). Using a threshold score of ≥ 50 on the SUS as an indicator of O2O-PEP user-acceptability, it was found that 90% (17/19) of the sample surpassed this cutoff, indicating their acceptance of the mini-app.
In-depth review
In a comprehensive review involving 19 participants at the conclusion of the pilot trial, we sought to understand their perspectives on the O2O-PEP intervention. Categorizing their opinions into four distinct areas, we explored: (1) their preferences and reservations regarding intervention features, (2) factors influencing daily use, (3) suggestions for feature enhancements or additions, and (4) their likelihood of using O2O-PEP in the future.
Intervention features being liked and disliked
The overall consensus is that O2O-PEP moderately fulfills the need and expectations of its user base. A prominent feature that generated significant interest was the “Share on Moments”, with 11 participants expressing appreciation. One participant highlighted the value of this component, stating, “You can read stories from others, like how he found his sexual partner, how he was infected with HIV. Very scary, which can also warn others” [30-years old MSM]. However, not every participant favored this feature; one participant explicitly disliked it, stating, “The topics are irrelevant to my life, I don’t care” [31-year-old MSM]. Other liked features included character-based narratives (n = 10), and medication aide (n = 5). A few participants disliked these features, including character-based narratives (n = 7), and medication aide (n = 4). For example, a 21-year-old MSM stated, “the character-based narratives, combined with card-based rewards, provide limited entertainment value and interactivity. The frequent flashing of cards on the screen can be somewhat annoying”. As our intervention intended to overcome PEP inaccessibility to improve PEP uptake amongst MSM, we sought to understand why participants dislike the function of medication aide, reasons can be summarized as following: (i) the online health platform (HeHealth) webpage complicated and were unsure how to quickly access PEP (n = 2), (ii) online pre-purchase physician evaluations burdensome (n = 1), and (iii) concerns that easy access to PEP might encourage risky sexual behaviors (n = 1). Regarding character-based narratives, some participants disliked them (n = 7), 5 participants suggesting the storylines were too simple and lacked comprehensive integration of PEP knowledge, another two participants mentioned that the animation-based design was only suitable for younger MSM and less so for older individuals.
Factors affecting daily use
The majority of participants found the mini-app easy to navigate (n = 15), with comments like “It is really straightforward. You know, I even don’t need to spend more time to learn how to use the mini-app after the staff shows it to me” [21-year-old MSM].
However, four participants encountered barriers to daily use, primarily related to technical challenges. Examples included app flashback and slow loading, as expressed by one participant: “It was a little bit laggy when I first tried to click into my profile page” [23-years old MSM]. Additionally, one participant highlighted the limitation of having only one offline hospital for PEP services, stating that it was inconvenient for those living far from the designated hospital [22-years old MSM].
Additional features to be added to O2O-PEP
Eight participants expressed a desire for additional functions in O2O-PEP. These included proving information about psychological counseling and mental health service (25%, 2/8), STDs (25%, 2/8, e.g., syphilis and Condyloma acuminatum), PrEP (25%, 2/8), HIV testing locations (2/8), dating function (1/8), and more introductory information about CBOs (13%, 1/8).
Likelihood to use O2O-PEP in the future
Eleven participants expressed a positive intent to continue using O2O-PEP even after the research program concluded. One participant stated, “This is really a good app, I would recommend it to my friends if they need it” [25-year-old MSM]. However, seven participants indicated that their future use depended on factors such as their available time and the update speed of the mini-app. Only one participant stated he would never use the mini-app again due to time constraints, expressing, “absolutely not, it’s too much a hassle, and the time investment is excessively high” [30-years old MSM].
Discussion
Principal findings
In the context of growing interest in gamifying digital interventions for HIV prevention, our study aimed to test the impact of a gamified mHealth mini-app, O2O-PEP, on promoting PEP uptake among Chinese MSM. Developed internally with multidisciplinary support, the study evaluated acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy in 19 participants, revealing promising potential for enhancing PEP uptake.
Our study findings suggest that the mini-app was both feasible and acceptable during the 2-week evaluation period, although the in-depth interviews highlighted areas requiring improvement. Notably, two gamified elements—a point-based reward system and social connectivity—were creatively integrated into various intervention modules to enhance engagement. For instance, users could accrue points and game card-based rewards upon completing different intervention components, and the “Share on moments” module fostered a sense of social connectivity. The point-based reward system operates on the principle that individuals are motivated to repeat desired behaviors to obtain further rewards. Due to its straightforward reinforcement nature, this system has found widespread application in various gamified interventions [21, 41]. Another crucial element, social connectivity, involves behaviors inspired by what other people think, say, or do. However, our data revealed a decline in app usage over the study duration, with some users expressing dissatisfaction, particularly with game card-based rewards, describing them as annoying. This observation aligns with findings reported in other studies [42]. Notably, several factors, both within and external to the mini-app, may impact usage. These encompass diverse game-based elements, users’ perceptions of app usability, and the speed at which intervention components are updated [43]. Cugelman B has presented seven criteria that intervention developers can leverage to craft a promising gamified intervention, namely goal setting, capacity to overcome challenges, providing feedback on performance, reinforcement, compare progress, social connectivity, and fun and playfulness [44]. Therefore, study researchers should collaborate with companies specializing in gamification technology and explore opportunities to integrate additional game components into the future development of digital interventions, aiming to enhance user engagement and overall effectiveness.
HIV PEP continues to be an underutilized HIV prevention measure in China, facing numerous barriers that hinder its widespread adoption. Among the challenges reported by MSM are the tedious administrative procedures in HIV/AIDS designated hospitals, characterized by awkward access to PEP clinics and long waiting times. Additionally, individuals expressed a sense of shame during the PEP consultation process in a traditional doctor’s office setting [45]. To address these issues, our study incorporated the “medication aide” module, directing participants to the online health platform HeHealth. HeHealth offers a sequential pathway for MSM to access PEP, including HIV risk assessment, pre-PEP usage counseling, PEP prescription, medication delivery, and follow-up phone calls. This digital approach aims to circumvent face-to-face visits to health facilities, particularly in environments perceived as unfriendly [16]. However, participants noted that pre-PEP counseling in the online platform (HeHealth) introduced its own set of challenges, describing it as a stressful and burdensome situation. Individuals exposed to increased risks of acquiring HIV often prioritize initiating PEP as quickly as possible. This sense of urgency may result in a reduced emphasis on or even disregard for pre-PEP counseling services. For instance, participants may focus solely on absorbing critical information shared during the counseling session without fully engaging in a two-way discussion, as their primary concern is to begin PEP promptly. Therefore, there is a call for the integration of more online mental health service for MSM during this critical phase. The mini-app’s most appreciated feature, “Share on Moments”, creates a platform for asynchronous peer-to-peer interaction and social connectivity. This aligns with the preferences of MSM, who have consistently advocated for such features in the design of HIV prevention interventions [46]. Despite its popularity, user analytics revealed that over half of the participants did not actively post or interact with others during the pilot trial. This reluctance may stem from concerns about privacy and perceived stigma associated with homosexuality, potentially deterring participation in HIV prevention programs [47].
Our data indicated a significant improvement in users’ PEP knowledge following the two-week intervention, with a Cohen’s d effect size of 0.8. In contrast to previous research on PEP, which has predominantly focused on aspects such as awareness, intention to use PEP, uptake, adherence, and their influencing factors [30, 48], there has been a notable gap in assessing in-depth PEP knowledge among MSM [49]. The observed enhancement in PEP knowledge scores over time suggests that O2O-PEP may have efficiently addressed a critical unmet need in the MSM community. However, despite the improvement in knowledge, a substantial gap persists between knowledge and healthy behaviors [50], To establish the true effectiveness of O2O-PEP in enhancing PEP uptake, future research is essential, emphasizing the need for a well-powered study.
Given the nearly universal ownership of mobile phones among MSM, mobile health technology has emerged as an ideal platform to reach individuals who may face challenges attending in-person health care services. The mobile mini-app facilitates the delivery of high-quality behavioral intervention to MSM via smartphones, allowing them to engage at their convenience in a private setting. While challenges in developing mHealth interventions, such as additional resource and time for developing, testing, and debugging, have been reported [51], there is a growing shift towards adapting existing evidence-based platforms that share common goals and functions to promote health behavior change [52]. For instance, Liu S et al. introduced PATHVERSE, a no-code mHealth app design platform, enabling researchers to design customized app content based on their specific research topics [53]. Although PATHVERSE has yet to be applied in the field of HIV prevention and care, future studies are warranted to explore its potential contributions to HIV related digital interventions.
Study strengths and limitations
This study demonstrated that the gamified mHealth-based intervention O2O-PEP is both feasible and acceptable among Chinese MSM. These results provided a strong foundation for expanding the trial to a larger sample size, which will facilitate a more comprehensive assessment of its efficacy in promoting HIV PEP usage. While our study findings should be interpreted in light of certain limitations. Firstly, the small sample size and purposive sampling represents a significant constraint. For instance, recruiting participants familiar with CBO staff may have introduced selection bias into the study sample, potentially overrepresenting individuals who are more engaged with HIV prevention initiatives. This may limit the generalizability of our findings to those less connected to CBOs or unfamiliar with HIV-related services. To address this limitation and strengthen the evidence base, we intend to enroll a more diverse cohort of MSM in future research. Secondly, the absence of a control group limits the validation of the intervention’s efficacy in PEP uptake and related behavioral health outcomes. Thirdly, the delivery of interviews through remote telephone contact posed a constraint, as it restricted our ability to observe participants’ body language and the surrounding environment, factors that could influence their feedback to the interview guide. Fourthly, the study did not analyze the effect of O2O-PEP in different subgroups of the population due to limitations in the sample size. Future research should explore the efficacy of O2O-PEP across highly vulnerable subgroups of MSM, such as young versus old MSM or single versus married MSM. Fifthly, numerous studies have confirmed that cost is a significant barrier to PEP usage among Chinese MSM. However, our study did not account for its impact on HIV PEP usage. Further research should explore how policy interventions, such as cost subsidies, can enhance the uptake of HIV PEP among MSM. Lastly, the study did not delve into recommendations for scalable app domains, like character-based narratives, primarily due to development cost considerations. This aspect is earmarked for prioritization in a subsequent study.
Conclusions
Overall, our study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of O2O-PEP among Chinese MSM. Future well-powered research is needed to assess its effectiveness in improving PEP uptake, emphasizing the potential impact of gamified digital interventions in HIV prevention and care.
Data availability
The participant level data cannot be made publicly available, as participants’ consent only included data sharing within the project team. The dataset generated during this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- HIV:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- MSM:
-
Men who have sex with men
- PEP:
-
Post-exposure prophylaxis
- O2O:
-
Online-to-offline collaborative model for HIV postexposure prophylaxis
- SUS:
-
System usability scale
- AIDS:
-
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
- RCT:
-
Randomized controlled trial
- CBO:
-
Community-based organization
- PrEP:
-
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
- STDs:
-
Sexually transmitted diseases
- PHQ-9:
-
9-item patient health questionnaire
- M:
-
Mean
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
References
Stannah J, Soni N, Lam JKS, Giguère K, Mitchell KM, Kronfli N, Larmarange J, Moh R, Nouaman M, Kouamé GM, et al. Trends in HIV testing, the treatment cascade, and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2023;10(8):e528–42.
World Health Organizaiton. World AIDS day report 2020. URL:https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/prevailing-against-pandemics_en.pdf [Accessed 2024-12-20].
UNAIDS. FACT SHEET 2024 Global HIV statistics URL. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf. [Accessed 2024-03-20].
He N. Research progress in the epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in China. China CDC Wkly. 2021;3(48):1022–30.
Pan L, Xue H, Yu F, Shan D, Zhang D, Wang J. Status and associated factors of pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men in 24 cities in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 2023;44(6):905–11.
Irvine C, Egan KJ, Shubber Z, Van Rompay KK, Beanland RL, Ford N. Efficacy of HIV postexposure prophylaxis: systematic review and Meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(Suppl 3):S165–169.
Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, Srivastava PU, Marcus R, Abiteboul D, Heptonstall J, Ippolito G, Lot F, McKibben PS, et al. A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. Centers for disease control and prevention needlestick surveillance group. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(21):1485–90.
Cresswell F, Asanati K, Bhagani S, Boffito M, Delpech V, Ellis J, Fox J, Furness L, Kingston M, Mansouri M, et al. UK guideline for the use of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis 2021. HIV Med. 2022;23(5):494–545.
Merchant RC, Mayer KH, Browning CA. Development of guidelines on nonoccupational HIV postexposure prophylaxis for the state of Rhode Island. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(2):136–40.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on post-exposure prophylaxis and the use of co-trimoxazole propyhlaxis for HIV-related infections among adults, adolecents and children: recommendations for a public health approach. URL: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/145719/9789241508193_eng.pdf?sequence=1. [Accessed: 2024-12-20].
National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention. China CDC.Techinical guidelines for HIV nonoccupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis. URL: https://ncaids.chinacdc.cn/tzgg_10268/202011/W020201116802422550750.pdf. [Accessed: 2024-03-19].
Wang Z, Yuan T, Fan S, Qian HZ, Li P, Zhan Y, Li H, Zou H. HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis of global data. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2020;34(5):193–204.
Hou J, Wu Y, Xie L, Meng S, Fu R, Zheng H, He N, Huang X, Xu J, Meyers K. Post-exposure prophylaxis: an underutilized biomedical HIV prevention method among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in China. AIDS Care. 2020;32(12):1573–80.
Wang Z, Yang L, Yuan T, Huang R, Li P, Zhang K, Wang G, Zhou Y, Luo D, Meng X, et al. Awareness and uptake of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in China: a cross-sectional study. Psychol Health Med. 2024;29(2):223–35.
Ding H, Ye Z, Tang W, Huang X, Wang H, Cui S, Jiang Y, Geng W, Xu J, Shang H. Context and barriers to the prescription of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis among HIV medical care providers: National Internet-Based observational study in China. JMIR Public Health Surveillance. 2021;7(3):e24234.
Shan D, Xue H, Yu F, Zan X, Liu H, Liu J, Han M, Zhang D. Understanding the uptake and outcomes of Non-occupational postexposure prophylaxis use through an online medical platform in China: Web-Based Cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e42729.
Miller G. The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(3):221–37.
Liu H, Ma Y, Chen J, Li Q, Zhang L, Ma P, Zhang F, Wang H, Sun L, Chen Q, et al. Expert consensus on HIV-related medical services provided by internet hospitals. Chin J AIDS STD. 2021;27(12):1332–7.
Rodrigues LF, Oliveira A, Rodrigues H. Main gamification concepts: A systematic mapping study. Heliyon. 2019;5(7):e01993.
Mazeas A, Duclos M, Pereira B, Chalabaev A. Evaluating the effectiveness of gamification on physical activity: systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e26779.
Vermeir JF, White MJ, Johnson D, Crombez G, Van Ryckeghem DML. The effects of gamification on computerized cognitive training: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Serious Games. 2020;8(3):e18644.
Luo Q, Zhang Y, Wang W, Cui T, Li T. mHealth-Based gamification interventions among men who have sex with men in the HIV prevention and care continuum: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2024;12:e49509.
Jiang Z, Wang Q, Liang J, Gu Y, Han Z, Li J, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Exploration of PrEP/PEP service delivery model in China: A pilot in Eastern, central and Western region. Global Health Med. 2024;6(5):295–303.
Luo Q, Luo Y, Li T, Cui T. An integrated online-to-offline model for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (O2O-PEP) scale-up among men who have sex with men (MSM): protocol for developing a pilot randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1026137.
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: part 4 - Interventional studies. Perspect Clin Res. 2019;10(3):137–9.
Li T, Luo Q, Cui T, Gong L. Current status and factors of the usage of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men utilizing gay social applications in Qingdao City. Chin J AIDS STD. 2024;30(9):935–9.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.
Tarantino N, Lartey M, Arnold T, Brown L, Kwara A, Guthrie K. Preferences for a Game-Based SMS adherence intervention among young people living with HIV in Ghana: A qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(7):2169–81.
Freitas CAM, Rossi TA, Dourado I, Castellanos MEP, Guimarães NS, Magno L. Mapping evidence on health promotion in HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women using the social-ecological model and the vulnerability theoretical framework: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1946.
Cui T, Li T, Wang G, Yang J, Zhang Y, Ren X, Luo Q. Qualitative study on taking HIV non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis and its influening factors among men who have sex with men. Chin J AIDS STD. 2023;29(3):287–90.
Wang Y, Liu S, Zhang Y, Tan W, Xie W, Gan Y, Zheng C, Li H, Yang Z, Jiang L, et al. Use of HIV Post-Exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Shenzhen, China: A serial Cross-Sectional study. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(10):3231–41.
Guo J, Kang W, Liu T, Xu J, Tang H, Lyu F, Zhang G. Analysis of knowledge level and use of antiretroviral Pre-Exposure and Post-Exposure prophylaxis among MSM - China, 2019–2022. China CDC Wkly. 2023;5(13):292–6.
Luo Q, Huang X, Li L, Ding Y, Mi G, Scott SR, Zhao Y, Rou K, He N, Wu H, et al. External validation of a prediction tool to estimate the risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection amongst men who have sex with men. Medicine. 2019;98(29):e16375.
Li L, Jiang Z, Song W, Ding Y, Xu J, He N. Development of HIV infection risk assessment tool for men who have sex with men based on Delphi method. Chin J Endemiology. 2017;38(10):1426–30.
Neilands TB, Steward WT, Choi KH. Assessment of stigma towards homosexuality in China: a study of men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(5):838–44.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.
Mitchell JT, LeGrand S, Hightow-Weidman LB, McKellar MS, Kashuba AD, Cottrell M, McLaurin T, Satapathy G, McClernon FJ. Smartphone-Based contingency management intervention to improve Pre-Exposure prophylaxis adherence: pilot trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018;6(9):e10456.
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94.
Li H, Piqueiras E, Chow EPF, Jiao K, Lewis T, Ma W. HIV non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) awareness and promotion among five key populations in China: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Reg Health: Western Pac. 2021;7:100086.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition): Routledge; 1988.
Ahn SJG, Johnsen K, Ball C. Points-Based reward systems in gamification impact children’s physical activity strategies and psychological needs. Health Educ Behav. 2019;46(3):417–25.
Amagai S, Pila S, Kaat AJ, Nowinski CJ, Gershon RC. Challenges in participant engagement and retention using mobile health apps: literature review. J J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(4):e35120.
Hightow-Weidman L, Muessig KE, Egger JR, Vecchio A, Platt A. Epic allies: A gamified mobile app to improve engagement in HIV care and antiretroviral adherence among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(8):2599–617.
Cugelman B. Gamification. What it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games. 2013;1(1):e3.
Palich R, Martin-Blondel G, Cuzin L, Le Talec JY, Boyer P, Massip P, Delobel P. Experiences of HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) among highly exposed men who have sex with men (MSM). Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(7):493–8.
Shrestha R, Altice FL, Khati A, Azwa I, Gautam K, Gupta S, Sullivan PS, Ni Z, Kamarulzaman A, Phiphatkunarnon P, et al. Clinic-Integrated smartphone app (JomPrEP) to improve uptake of HIV testing and Pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Malaysia: mixed methods evaluation of usability and acceptability. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2023;11:e44468.
Huebner DM, Davis MC, Nemeroff CJ, Aiken LS. The impact of internalized homophobia on HIV preventive interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 2002;30(3):327–48.
Mitchell JW, Sophus AI, Petroll AE. HIV-Negative partnered Men’s willingness to use Non-Occupational Post-Exposure prophylaxis and associated factors in a U.S. Sample of HIV-Negative and HIV-Discordant male couples. LGBT Health. 2016;3(2):146–52.
Li H, Wei R, Weinstein TL, Kim E, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Ning X, Ma W. Development of the non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) knowledge scale among Chinese men who have sex with men. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1329.
Liu H, Zhu Q, Zhang L, Liu Y, Xu P, Yu M, Fan J, Pan X, Chen X, Xu H, et al. HIV-Related knowledge, attitude, and practices research among college Students - Six Chinese cities, 2021. China CDC Wkly. 2022;4(47):1043–50.
Horvath KJ, Ecklund AM, Hunt SL, Nelson TF, Toomey TL. Developing Internet-based health interventions: a guide for public health researchers and practitioners. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e28.
Labrique AB, Wadhwani C, Williams KA, Lamptey P, Hesp C, Luk R, Aerts A. Best practices in scaling digital health in low and middle income countries. Globalization Health. 2018;14(1):103.
Liu S, La H, Willms A, Rhodes RE. A No-Code app design platform for mobile health research: development and usability study. JMIR Formative Res. 2022;6(8):e38737.
Acknowledgements
We thank Home for Researchers editorial team (www.home-for-researchers.com) for language editing service.
Funding
This research was supported from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72104033) and Shandong Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202410440005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TC and TL contributed equally to the manuscript, they were responsible for data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the results, and writing. LG and KW supported the drafting of the manuscript. QL contributed to the study conception and idea, writing, reviewing, and editing. QL and KW received the funding for the study. All authors contributed to manuscript revisions and approved the final version for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the institutional review board of Binzhou Medical University (IRB# 2021-007). Our study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was retrieved from all study participants upon enrollment in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.


Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cui, T., Li, T., Gong, L. et al. Preliminary evaluation of a gamified smartphone intervention (O2O-PEP) for enhancing HIV post-exposure prophylaxis uptake in men who have sex with men: pilot feasibility study. BMC Public Health 25, 1539 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12889-025-22818-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12889-025-22818-w