Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Download PDF

The quality and reliability of online video resources concerning patient education for migraine treatment in China Mainland: an electronic media-based study

BMC Public Health volume 25, Article number: 656 (2025) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Migraine is an extremely prevalent and disabling primary neurological disease worldwide. Although multiple forms of patient education for migraine management have been employed in the past decades, the quality and reliability of headache-related online videos targeting migraine patients remained unclear, particularly those in China. Therefore, in this study, our research team aimed to explore the overall quality and credibility of online videos concerning patient education on migraine treatment in China Mainland.

Methods

A total of 182 online videos concerning migraine treatment were retrieved from four most popular Chinese language online video platforms, including Douyin, BiliBili, Haokan Video, and Xigua Video. Our research team collected the producer identity and basic information of these videos, and then used two major score instruments, i.e., the Global Quality Score (GQS) scale and the DISCERN questionnaire, to evaluate the quality and reliability of its content. Subsequently, overall descriptive analysis and detailed comparison among specific video platforms and producers were performed. Finally, using the Spearman correlation coefficient, we also explored the potential correlation between video general information and video quality and reliability.

Results

The overall quality and reliability of the migraine-related information provided by online videos were poor, yet those uploaded to Douyin were relatively more satisfactory. Among all study videos, 10 encouraged patients to keep a headache diary, 12 warned about the risk of medication overuse, and 32 emphasized the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. However, the treatment recommendations proposed by video creators were highly heterogenous, with the most frequently mentioned pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and traditional Chinese medicine measures being Triptans (n = 57, 31.3%), massage (n = 40, 22.0%), and acupuncture (n = 31, 17.0%), respectively. We also observed slight positive correlations between video quality and the numbers of likes and comments received.

Conclusions

The results of our research revealed that the quality and reliability of Chinese language online videos focused on patient education for migraine treatment were inadequate, suggesting that viewers should treat these contents with caution. However, the prospects for video-based patient education remain promising. Implementing appropriate strategies, such as strengthening regulations on health-related videos and instituting a review process conducted by medical professionals, may elevate the overall quality and trustworthiness of medical information shared through online video platforms.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

As a highly prevalent and debilitating primary neurological disorder, migraine is characterized by recurrent episodes of moderate to severe unilateral throbbing headaches, along with a variety of physical and mental comorbidities [1,2,3]. It impacts over one billion individuals worldwide annually [4] and causes far more disability than all other neurological disorders combined [5, 6]. Although mounting research has identified numerous risk factors and triggers related to migraine and has shed light on its specific pathophysiological mechanisms [7], this disease remains largely under-recognized, under-diagnosed, and under-treated [8]. This lack of recognition and treatment places a significant burden on patients and their caregivers, adversely affecting their productivity [9] and the economy of their society [10].

Therefore, proper patient education is increasingly considered an essential factor in achieving better migraine management around the world [11, 12]. Various forms of educational resources, including brochures [13], standardized courses led by trained instructors [14], and CD-ROMs [15], have been shown to significantly enhance patients’ confidence and adherence to treatment, while also curtailing unnecessary medical resource expenditure. Fortunately, the rapid growth of the internet in recent decades has notably transformed the methods of health-related education, creating new opportunities for patient learning. Emerging electronic social media platforms, such as Google [16], are progressively playing an important role in headache management and the communication of relevant scientific information [17]. Among these, online video platforms like YouTube and TikTok offer a distinct advantage over traditional text-based media, presenting graphical contents that can be more readily absorbed and remembered by audiences.

Although online video platforms have provided an abundance of freely accessible information regarding headaches, it remains a challenging and complex task for many migraine sufferers to thoroughly assess the overall quality and trustworthiness of the videos that are algorithmically suggested by search engines [18, 19]. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that some of these videos may be produced by individuals lacking adequate medical training and expertise, which could lead to the dissemination of various rumours, hoaxes, and misinformation [20, 21]. In fact, several previous investigations have revealed that the reliability of headache-related content on platforms like YouTube was generally poor and had ample room for improvement, even when the material was sourced from healthcare professionals [22, 23].

In light of this, a timely and thorough evaluation of online videos concerning headache information has become essential. However, following Google’s withdrawal of its operations from the Chinese market, YouTube has been unavailable in China Mainland since 2010. Instead, some Chinese domestic video-sharing platforms, such as TikTok, have quickly gained tremendous popularity with their engaging content and convenient interactions, attracting over one billion users nationwide. As a result, in this study, by searching and collecting data from four most popular local video sites, our research team aimed to explore the overall quality and reliability of online video resources concerning patient education for migraine treatment in China Mainland.

Methods and materials

Search strategy and data collection

In this cross-sectional study based on electronic media, the search terms “偏头痛” (“Migraine” in Chinese) and “治疗” (“Treatment” in Chinese) were adopted to search the top 50 videos automatically recommended by default overall ranking in four popular Chinese language online video-sharing platforms, including BiliBili (http://www.bilibili.com), Douyin (Chinese version of TikTok, http://www.douyin.com), Haokan Video (https://haokan.baidu.com), and Xigua Video (https://www.ixigua.com). As regards the introductions to these four Chinese domestic video websites used for analysis, a more detailed description can be found in Supplementary Table 1. The initial selection of video platforms was based on their operational characteristics, and only those platforms that offer free access to ordinary individual users to create and upload self-produced videos and allow frequent user-to-user interactions were considered, while those that focus on compensable services such as TV series, documentaries, films, or webcasts were excluded. Therefore, some other famous online video platforms in China, including YOUKU (https://www.youku.com/), iQIYI (https://www.iqiyi.com/), and Tencent Video (https://v.qq.com/), were not utilized in this study.

In this current study, the definition of migraine followed the guidelines from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), that migraine is a disabling primary neurological condition typically characterized by recurrent moderate or severe unilateral pulsatile headaches [3].

The search was performed on a Windows 10-operated personal computer using a newly installed Mozilla Firefox browser (version 121.0.1) in Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, within one day (December 26, 2023). In order to minimize the potential bias introduced by personal recommendation algorithms, all cookies, previous search history, and temporary internet files were deleted and video website accounts were logged out before and between search queries in the private mode.

After searching, the top 50 videos automatically recommended by default overall ranking in each video website were prepared for initial screening. This decision was based on a previous literature review that concluded that amateur internet health seekers seldom pay attention to content beyond the first two pages they find [24]. Therefore, in this circumstance, only the video materials on the first two pages were brought into consideration, and most Chinese language video platforms limit their video number on each page between approximately 20 and 30, we eventually included the top 50 (averagely 25 videos per page × 2 page) automatically recommended videos for further screening. The exclusion criteria were set as follows: (1) videos which are not in Chinese (the Chinese here includes Mandarin, Cantonese, and other dialects of Chinese); (2) videos which are irrelevant to migraine treatment; (3) commercial advertisements; (4) duplicates which are repeatedly uploaded to the same video platform. After screening, 14 irrelevant videos, 3 duplicate videos, and 1 video in other languages were excluded, while a total of 182 eligible online videos directly concerning migraine treatment were eventually included for further data extraction and content evaluation. A more detailed flow chart of search strategy and study design has been shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow chart of search strategy, video screening procedure, and further analysis of the study

Full size image

For those included videos, their general information, including uniform resource locators (URLs) authorship, the numbers of views, likes, shares and comments, date of upload, and video length were collected and recorded in an Excel sheet (Microsoft Corp).

Classification of videos

Our researchers categorized the included videos in accordance with their producer identity as follows: (1) general users; (2) health professionals; (3) news agencies; (4) for-profit organizations; and (5) non-profit organizations. For those online videos created by authors classified as health professionals, a further grouping was conducted as follows: (1) doctors specializing in neurology of modern evidence-based medicine; (2) doctors specializing in other areas of modern evidence-based medicine; (3) doctors of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM); (4) other health-related professionals. Furthermore, for videos produced by doctors of TCM, we additionally performed a more detailed classification based on their speciality as follows: (1) doctors specializing in traditional Chinese herbs; (2) doctors specializing in traditional Chinese physiotherapy; (3) doctors specializing in both traditional Chinese herbs and physiotherapy. A more detailed description of authorship classification can be found in Supplementary Table 2.

Quality and Reliability Assessment

In this study, two different questionnaires were employed respectively to quantify the overall quality and reliability of our included online videos concerning migraine treatment. The DISCERN instrument, which was first introduced to judge the quality of online information on treatment choices in 1999 [25], has now been widely validated and applied for evaluating health-related content on video-sharing websites [26,27,28,29]. Therefore, we adopted a modified DISCERN tool to rate the video content’s reliability based on 5 items (Table 1). The modified DISCERN score ranged from 0 to 5, and a greater score indicated better reliability (unreliable to reliable). Moreover, the Global Quality Score (GQS), as a commonly utilized 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor quality) to 5 (excellent quality) for the evaluation of health-related content on the internet [30,31,32], was also employed to assess the overall quality of our included videos in this study (Table 1). Currently, the combination of modified DISCERN questionnaire and GQS scale has been commonly utilized in the quality and credibility assessment of online health-related videos by previous researchers [26, 29], thus our current study similarly employed this evaluation strategy.

Table 1 The two major scoring instruments used for the evaluation of the quality and reliability of our included online videos concerning patient education for migraine treatment
Full size table

Two qualified researchers (Ge RG and Chen YH) with sufficient medical education and training background were assigned to independently rate the online videos with modified DISCERN and GQS tools. Before the formal scoring, two raters have fully reviewed and understood the questionnaires in detail to minimize potential biases caused by misunderstanding about the scoring instruments. Additionally, we used the Cohen’s Kappa test to quantify the agreement between the results from the two raters. A value of > 0.8 was considered excellent consistency, a value between 0.8 and 0.6 represents substantial consistency, a value between 0.6 and 0.4 represents moderate consistency, and a value of < 0.4 was considered poor consistency [33]. For those scores that cannot be agreed upon by two raters, a senior researcher (Chang J) was appointed to make a final decision.

Video content evaluation

In terms of the video content evaluation, we have referred to a previous study [16] and collected and described information on four main aspects as follows: (1) did the video mention the caution against medication overuse headache? (2) did the video encourage patients to keep a headache diary? (3) did the video emphasize the preventive migraine treatment? (4) what available treatments were recommended to patients in the video?

Statistical analysis

In this study, we adopted the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess the normality of the data extracted from the included videos. For those data which followed nonparametric distribution, the median and interquartile range (IQR) were used for descriptive analysis. While for those followed parametric distribution, the mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for descriptive analysis.

The nonparametric comparisons between two unpaired groups of data were performed with the Mann-Whitney test, while those between three or more groups of data were conducted with the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Moreover, we also employed the Spearman correlation coefficient to explore the potential association of video quality and reliability with video general information. The P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General information of eligible videos

After the exclusion criteria were applied, a total of 182 videos were included for further data extraction and analysis (Fig. 1). In this study, the median duration of videos was 117 s (IQR 74–217.3), the median number of video views was 4,276 (IQR 1,303 − 15,000), the median number of likes was 84 (IQR 9.75–862.5), the median number of shares was 246.5 (IQR 14.75–1534), and the median number of comments was 9 (IQR 1–87.25).

Among the four platforms, the median duration of videos on Douyin was generally shorter than those on the other three platforms, and the median number of likes, shares, and comments received by videos on Douyin was notably higher than the overall level. In terms of the identity of the video producers, as shown in Table 2 and 105 of 182 videos were created by health professionals (57.7%), but only 26 of them were made by doctors specializing in neurology of modern medicine. Among organizational users, for-profit organizations contributed the most videos (n = 27, 14.8%), followed by news agencies (n = 21, 11.5%) and non-profit organizations (n = 5, 2.7%). Interestingly, all 47 videos on Douyin were provided by health professionals, and only two of them were produced by doctors of TCM.

Table 2 The general information, producer identity, quality and reliability scores, content, and recommended migraine treatment of online videos uploaded on BiliBili, Douyin, Haokan Video, and Xigua Video
Full size table

Information quality and reliability

According to the results of the Cohen’s Kappa test, the Kappa coefficients of the DISCERN scores and GQS scores made by our two independent raters were 0.755 and 0.751, respectively, indicating a substantial consistency of our scoring process.

Generally, as shown in Table 2; Fig. 2A-B, the median of the DISCERN score of overall videos was 1 (IQR 1–2), and the median of the GQS score of overall videos was 2 (IQR 2–3), which represented that the overall quality and reliability of the content of our included videos were relatively poor. When examining specific video platforms, although Douyin enjoyed a greater median value of its DISCERN score compared to other video websites, only the difference between that from the Xigua Video was found to be statistically significant. However, notably, in terms of the GQS score, the videos from the Douyin platform received a greater quality score than the other three video platforms, with all P-values < 0.05.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The differences of video quality and reliability among specific video-sharing platforms (A-B), video producer identity (C-D), and medical speciality (E-F), *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, ****P <0.0001

Full size image

If we largely split the data according to their producer identity, results suggested that videos created by health professionals exhibited greater quality compared with those by news agencies and especially general individual users (Fig. 2C). Yet, as regards reliability, no significant difference was observed between videos from each video producer category (Fig. 2D). After further classifying the data on health professionals by their medical speciality, videos created by doctors specializing in modern medicine, regardless of neurology or other areas, showed notably greater quality as well as reliability over those by doctors of TCM (Fig. 2E-F). Interestingly, when examined by a more detailed subgroup of TCM doctors, it was observed that videos created by TCM practitioners who combined the utilization of physiotherapy and herb-based medicine were superior in both quality and reliability to those created by TCM practitioners who only solely specialized in physiotherapy or herb-based medicine (Supplementary Fig. 1A-B).

Video content

As shown in Table 2, the results suggested that only 10 of 182 videos encouraged patients to keep a headache diary and 12 of 182 videos warned about the risk of medication overuse, while slightly more migraine-related videos emphasized preventive treatment of the recurrence of chronic migraine, reaching 32 (17.6%). In terms of the recommended treatment choices, almost all of the videos gave recommendations for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. It was also observed that massage was the most frequently recommended non-pharmacological treatment and was mentioned in 40 of 182 videos (22.0%). For pharmacological treatment, Triptans was recommended most frequently (n = 57, 31.3%), followed by NSAIDs (n = 55, 30.2%), while pizotifen, mannitol, angiotensin II receptor blockers, barbiturates and melatonin were mentioned only once. To note, TCM, as a complementary medicine in China, was also strongly recommended in our included videos, where acupuncture was mentioned in 31 online videos (17.0%).

Association of video general information with video quality and reliability

According to Table 3, significant positive correlations were widely observed among the general information of included online videos, with the highest Spearman correlation coefficient being noticed between numbers of received likes and shares (r = 0.9654, P-value < 0.05). If we further brought the video quality and reliability into consideration, sadly, only the correlations of GQS score with number of received likes and comments were found to be slightly positive and statistically significant (r = 0.1585 and 0.1855 respectively, P-value < 0.05).

Table 3 The Spearman correlation coefficients between video general information and quality and reliability of video content
Full size table

Discussion

In this study based on 182 eligible videos, our research team reviewed and assessed the general characteristics, video content, quality, and reliability of migraine treatment-related online videos from the four most popular Chinese language video-sharing platforms. This paper might be one of the first studies to investigate the Chinese language videos concerning migraine treatment, which may contribute to a better understanding of the current status of and the shortcomings of migraine education for patients based on electronic media in China Mainland.

Overall, the quality and reliability of our included videos concerning migraine treatment for informal patient education were relatively poor and unsatisfactory, and significant differences were observed between different video platforms and video producers. To be more specific, the videos from Douyin enjoyed significantly better quality compared with those three other platforms, yet only had a modest statistical advantage over Xigua Video on the topic of video reliability. If we brought the identity of video producers into consideration, the overall quality of videos posted by health professionals was greater than those from general users and news agencies. However, for reliability, no significant statistical differences were observed. After classifying the health professionals into three subtypes, it was found that videos produced by doctors of modern medicine, regardless of neurologist and non-neurologist, had an overwhelming advantage over doctors of TCM on both video quality and reliability. However, when further examined by the TCM doctor category, videos from TCM practitioners who jointly master traditional Chinese physiotherapy and herb-based medicine exhibited greater quality and reliability compared with those from TCM practitioners who solely specialize in physiotherapy or herbal medicine.

As regards the migraine treatment recommended by video creators, only 6.6% included videos mentioned the risk of medication overuse, 5.5% included videos encouraged patients to keep a headache diary, and 17.6% included videos emphasized the preventive treatment for the recurrence of chronic migraine. For specific treatment measures; massage, avoiding headache triggers, and relaxation were the top three most frequently recommended non-pharmacological choices, Triptans, NSAIDs, and anticonvulsants were the top three most frequently recommended pharmacological choices, while acupuncture, herbs, and moxibustion were the top three most frequently recommended TCM choices.

Additionally, several common problems and shortcomings observed in the video content were also outlined during our evaluation as follows, which may potentially bring adverse effects to their audiences and migraine patients. First and also most importantly, some video producers, particularly general users and doctors of TCM, tended to exaggerate or overestimate the effectiveness and benefits of treatment measures they recommended, or even worse, propose completely baseless and irresponsible statements. For example, a producer of our included online video recklessly claimed that certain traditional Chinese herbs can “eliminate” migraine forever, yet without any sound evidence from relevant scientific research. Therefore, these very behaviours might cause unfounded, unscientific, and highly misleading information about migraine treatment for the patient population. Second, the treatment recommendations, especially pharmacological, provided by the majority of our included videos were outdated and insufficient. Some recently emerging approaches to combating migraine, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies, were less frequently mentioned by video producers compared with other conventional medications for migraine. At the same time, despite the Triptans being the most commonly recommended for migraine treatment in our included online videos, the real-world utilization of Triptans in China was severely constrained. In fact, there are currently only two types of Triptans (Rizatriptan and Zolmitriptan) that are theoretically available with a prescription at pharmacies and hospitals in China. Compared with other cheap and easily purchased over-the-counter painkillers, Triptans are notably less accessible for most migraine or other headache patients residing in China. Finally, we also noticed that a large number of medical jargons were employed by health professionals, which might be difficult for patients with little medical education background to fully understand. For example, some video producers might simply put forward the term “NSAIDs” but did not provide any further explanation or clarification. However, given that the vast majority of the Chinese audiences lack medical or pharmacological knowledge, this technical term may end up causing confusion and misunderstanding, and even leading to medication errors.

In order to explain the overall finding of our current study and the common issues of the included videos concluded above, we have proposed several speculations. First, in fact, our four included online video websites were all commercial and profit-oriented and were not specifically intended for healthcare professionals. In other words, due to the lack of professionalism, it might be difficult for them to conduct any form of peer review or the most basic check on the integrity and accuracy of the medical and scientific content provided by the video creators. Besides, considering that the majority of the general users of these video platforms were completely for entertainment and curious purposes, this might in turn force the video uploaders to create their videos and titles with sensational and unilateral words to catch the viewers’ eyes, which may potentially distort the expression of their video contents. Moreover, it cannot be ignored that TCM is extremely popular among the Chinese patients. Despite the TCM has been reported to be likely to help the management of migraine [34,35,36], the exact effectiveness of some treatment recommendations from TCM remained controversial and the overall quality of their clinical evidence were still generally poor or occasionally moderate [37]. At last, given the setting that migraine is a complicated primary neurological disorder, doctors specializing in other areas of modern medicine, such as cardiologist, gynaecologist, endocrinologist, et al. observed in this study, may not necessarily have sufficient neurological or headache-targeted knowledge to properly and thoroughly explain this disease to the audiences. These joint factors might be the main cause of the unstable and generally low quality and reliability of video content in the Chinese language concerning informal migraine patient education.

Fortunately, although the performance of online videos collected and evaluated in our current study was relatively unsatisfactory and disappointing, it cannot be denied that video-based patient education is still a highly promising game-changer to disease prevention and management worldwide [38,39,40]. Appropriate measures to better regulate and monitor the quality and reliability of disease-related video resources, such as the construction of an online video platform that fully targets the patient population and can be sufficiently reviewed by healthcare professionals, might be helpful to further increase the effectiveness and efficiency of patient learning and eventually lead to a deeper disease understanding. At the same time, government departments and dedicated corporate communication agencies should also shoulder their responsibilities and persevere in combating unsubstantiated rumours and misinformation disseminated through the internet.

However, there were several limitations in our current article. First, despite we have included a total of 182 online videos from four video-sharing platforms for our study, a larger sample size is still needed in the future for more precise evaluation to better understand and combat the downside of health-related misinformation spread by online videos. Additionally, the potential influence caused by the automatic recommendation algorithms of video platforms cannot be completely excluded, even though measures have been taken to minimize it. In addition, the overall quality and credibility of online healthcare-related videos may also be affected by the partial or total plagiarism and re-uploading of certain video materials by other producers, although some online video-sharing platforms have built their user-reporting system targeting the theft of others’ creations. Besides, videos from some less popular, smaller video-sharing sites in China were inevitably omitted, thus to some extent leading to selection bias. It also should be highlighted that, although the GQS scale and modified DISCERN questionnaire have been commonly used for video assessment by previous researchers, they are still not fully customized evaluation tools for online videos. Finally, our current study highly targeted China and only specifically revealed the quality and reliability of Chinese language online videos, yet those in other languages, such as Japanese, Korean, and English, were not further explored, which calls for future research.

Through this investigation based on Chinese language electronic media, our researchers have successfully revealed the generally poor quality and reliability of online videos for informal patient education concerning migraine treatment in China Mainland, pointing out the necessity for the Chinese migraine population to evaluate the headache-related video content with full caution, and the practical demand for more video resources with professional knowledge of evidence-based medicine, which may contribute to better controlling primary headache disorders in China Mainland in the future. Additionally, it also highlighted the growing importance of a more active participation of Chinese medical societies as well as local government healthcare-related agencies in the public education about migraine management, reinforcing the combat against online disinformation, and leading the patients towards correct and in-depth information source.

Conclusion

Overall, the quality and reliability of Chinese language online videos concerning informal patient education for migraine treatment uploaded to four popular domestic video platforms in China Mainland were poor and the health-related information provided by which should be treated with caution by its audiences. Nevertheless, video-based disease management is still promising and hopeful to be a game-changer in the future. Therefore, sound actions and strategies are urgently needed to further improve the general performance of online content associated with medical professional knowledge and constrain the potential spread of misleading information.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Minen MT, De Begasse O, Van Kroon A, Powers S, Schwedt TJ, Lipton R, et al. Migraine and its psychiatric comorbidities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(7):741–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burch RC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine: epidemiology, burden, and comorbidity. Neurol Clin. 2019;37(4):631–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amiri P, Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Mohammadinasab R, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, et al. Migraine: a review on its history, Global Epidemiology, risk factors, and comorbidities. Front Neurol. 2021;12:800605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):954–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charles A. The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):174–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu H, Dong M, Liu K, Jia Z, Gui W, Cheng Y, et al. Status of diagnosis and preventative treatment for primary headache disorders: real-world data of unmet needs in China. J Headache Pain. 2023;24(1):119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong LP, Alias H, Bhoo-Pathy N, Chung I, Chong YC, Kalra S, et al. Impact of migraine on workplace productivity and monetary loss: a study of employees in banking sector in Malaysia. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lanteri-Minet M. Economic burden and costs of chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(1):385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eigenbrodt AK, Ashina H, Khan S, Diener HC, Mitsikostas DD, Sinclair AJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(8):501–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kindelan-Calvo P, Gil-Martínez A, Paris-Alemany A, Pardo-Montero J, Muñoz-García D, Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S, et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic patient education for adults with migraine. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Med. 2014;15(9):1619–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Medrano Martínez V, Callejo-Domínguez JM, Beltrán-Lasco I, Pérez-Carmona N, Abellán-Miralles I, González-Caballero G, et al. Migraine education brochures and patient-perceived satisfaction. Neurologia. 2015;30(8):472–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rothrock JF, Parada VA, Sims C, Key K, Walters NS, Zweifler RM. The impact of intensive patient education on clinical outcome in a clinic-based migraine population. Headache. 2006;46(5):726–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cady R, Farmer K, Beach ME, Tarrasch J. Nurse-based education: an office-based comparative model for education of migraine patients. Headache. 2008;48(4):564–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bojazar R, Do TP, Hansen JM, Dodick DW, Ashina M. Googling migraine: a study of Google as an information resource of migraine management. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(14):1633–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Do TP, Andreou AP, de Oliveira AB, Shapiro RE, Lampl C, Amin FM. The increasing role of electronic media in headache. BMC Neurol. 2023;23(1):194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Song S, Zhang Y, Yu B. Interventions to support consumer evaluation of online health information credibility: a scoping review. Int J Med Inf. 2021;145:104321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gwizdka J, Trace CB. Consumer evaluation of the quality of online health information: systematic literature review of relevant criteria and indicators. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e12522.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tasnim S, Hossain MM, Mazumder H. Impact of rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(3):171–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed W, Vidal-Alaball J, Downing J, López Seguí F. COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: social network analysis of twitter data. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e19458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Reina-Varona Á, Rodríguez de Rivera-Romero B, Cabrera-López CD, Fierro-Marrero J, Sánchez-Ruiz I, La Touche R. Exercise interventions in migraine patients: a YouTube content analysis study based on grades of recommendation. PeerJ. 2022;10:e14150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaudhry BA, Do TP, Ashina H, Ashina M, Amin FM. Cluster headache - the worst possible pain on YouTube. Headache. 2022;62(9):1222–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7(5):497–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. He Z, Wang Z, Song Y, Liu Y, Kang L, Fang X, et al. The reliability and quality of short videos as a source of dietary guidance for inflammatory bowel disease: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e41518.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng S, Tong X, Wan D, Hu C, Hu Q, Ke Q. Quality and reliability of liver cancer-related short Chinese videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional content analysis study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e47210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kong W, Song S, Zhao YC, Zhu Q, Sha L. TikTok as a health information source: assessment of the quality of information in diabetes-related videos. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e30409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pan P, Yu C, Li T, Zhou X, Dai T, Tian H, et al. Xigua Video as a source of information on breast Cancer: content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e19668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Barlas T, Ecem Avci D, Cinici B, Ozkilicaslan H, Muhittin Yalcin M, Eroglu Altinova A. The quality and reliability analysis of YouTube videos about insulin resistance. Int J Med Inf. 2023;170:104960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun F, Zheng S, Wu J. Quality of information in gallstone disease videos on TikTok: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e39162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Schreuders EH, Grobbee EJ, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MC, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ. Variable quality and readability of patient-oriented websites on colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(1):79-e853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang Y, Ni N, Hong Y, Lin X, Feng Y, Shen L. Progress in Traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of migraine. Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(8):1731–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi YH, Wang Y, Fu H, Xu Z, Zeng H, Zheng GQ. Chinese herbal medicine for headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials. Phytomedicine. 2019;57:315–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Li JH, Cao XP, Wei JJ, Song L, Liao FJ, Zheng GQ, et al. Chuanxiong chadiao powder, a famous Chinese herbal prescription, for headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2015;23(4):577–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Millstine D, Chen CY, Bauer B. Complementary and integrative medicine in the management of headache. BMJ. 2017;357:j1805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Adeleye A, Cruz K, Cedars MI, Pasch L, Huddleston H. Learning from Online Video Education (LOVE) improves confidence in fertility treatments: a randomized controlled trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. McIntyre D, Kovoor JG, Chow CK, Quintans D, Marschner S, Thomas S, et al. Clinician-created video education for patients with AF: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2345308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Armstrong AW, Kim RH, Idriss NZ, Larsen LN, Lio PA. Online video improves clinical outcomes in adults with atopic dermatitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(3):502–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82171296), Science and Technology Program of Suzhou (Grant No. SKY2022114), and Innovative Frontier of Basic Research Project of Soochow University (Grant No. MP13904623).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Rongguang Ge and Xiuman Xu equally contributed to this study and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology and Clinical Research Centre of Neurological Disease, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215004, China

    Rongguang Ge, Xiuman Xu, Shoujiang You, Jiaping Xu, Haoyi Dai & Yongjun Cao

  2. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, 199 Renai Road, Suzhou, 215123, China

    Yunhao Chen, Wenqi Huang, Hongpeng Sun & Jie Chang

  3. The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Shoujiang You

  4. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Preventive and Translational Medicine for Major Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

    Jie Chang

  5. MOE Key Laboratory of Geriatric Diseases and Immunology, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

    Jie Chang

Authors
  1. Rongguang Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiuman Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunhao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shoujiang You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiaping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haoyi Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wenqi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hongpeng Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yongjun Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jie Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Concept and design: Ge RG and Xu JP; data collection and analysis: Ge RG, Xu XM, Chen YH, Dai HY, and Huang WQ, with extensive contributions from Ge RG and Xu XM; drafting of the article: Ge RG and Chen YH; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: You SJ and Sun HP; study supervision and funding: Cao YJ and Chang J. All the authors have read and approved the final article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongjun Cao or Jie Chang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our current study involved the analysis of publicly available data or the use of secondary data that do not contain any personal identifiers, thus ensuring the anonymity and confidentiality of the individuals concerned. In addition, the research did not involve any interventions or interactions with human participants, and no animals were utilized in the study. Compliance with ethical standards was maintained throughout the research process. After a careful evaluation of our study design, the official ethics waiver has been granted by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Serial No. JD-M2024-(001)).

Consent for publication

This study was not based on interventions or interactions between human participants or experimental animals. Therefore, the consent for publication is not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yongjun Cao and Jie Chang equally supervised this study and should be regarded as co-corresponding authors.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, R., Xu, X., Chen, Y. et al. The quality and reliability of online video resources concerning patient education for migraine treatment in China Mainland: an electronic media-based study. BMC Public Health 25, 656 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21861-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21861-x

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us