Skip to main content

Table 3 Direct, indirect, and total effects of the statistical model

From: Investigating the youth physical activity promotion model among Chinese middle school students

Relationships

Point

Estimation

Product of Coefficients

Bootstrapping

BC 95% CI

Percentile 95% CI

SE

Z

P

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Specific indirect effects

        

 RF→Able→Worth→PA

0.033

0.016

2.063

0.020

0.011

0.078

0.008

0.068

 RF→Able→PA

0.115

0.039

2.949

0.002

0.050

0.205

0.046

0.198

 RF→Worth→PA

0.079

0.035

2.257

0.012

0.025

0.170

0.019

0.158

 EN→Able→Worth→PA

0.011

0.005

2.200

0.014

0.003

0.023

0.002

0.021

 EN→Able→PA

0.037

0.014

2.643

0.004

0.015

0.070

0.013

0.067

Total indirect effect

        

 RF→PA

0.228

0.054

4.222

0.000

0.137

0.351

0.131

0.343

 EN→PA

0.047

0.015

3.133

0.001

0.021

0.081

0.020

0.080

Direct effect

        

 RF→PA

0.349

0.083

4.205

0.000

0.181

0.510

0.181

0.509

 EN→PA

0.115

0.025

4.600

0.000

0.068

0.165

0.066

0.163

Total effect

        

 RF→PA

0.576

0.069

8.348

0.000

0.437

0.708

0.436

0.707

 EN→PA

0.162

0.024

6.750

0.000

0.116

0.211

0.115

0.210

  1. Note: N = 463. 5,000 bootstrap sample; SE, standard error; BC, bias corrected; CI, confidence interval; Worth, Is it worth it?; Able, Am I able?; RF, Reinforcing Factors; EF, Enabling Factors; PA, Physical Activity