Skip to main content

Table 2 CFA results for the measurement model

From: Investigating the youth physical activity promotion model among Chinese middle school students

Construct

Item

Parameter Significance Estimation

 

Convergent Validity

Unstd.

SE

t-value

P

 

Std.

SMC

CR

AVE

Enabling factors

EN1

1.000

    

0.854

0.729

0.931

0.661

EN2

0.791

0.040

19.701

***

 

0.762

0.581

  

EN3

0.920

0.038

24.442

***

 

0.868

0.753

  

EN4

0.886

0.038

23.219

***

 

0.843

0.711

  

EN5

0.754

0.037

20.585

***

 

0.784

0.615

  

EN6

0.904

0.039

23.216

***

 

0.843

0.711

  

EN7

0.682

0.037

18.225

***

 

0.724

0.524

  

Reinforcing factors

RF1

1.000

    

0.771

0.594

0.870

0.573

RF2

1.159

0.066

17.476

***

 

0.807

0.651

  

RF3

0.977

0.061

15.946

***

 

0.741

0.549

  

RF4

0.963

0.059

16.197

***

 

0.752

0.566

  

RF5

0.917

0.060

15.253

***

 

0.712

0.507

  

Am I able?

PC

1.000

    

0.834

0.696

0.802

0.670

SE

0.934

0.071

13.204

***

 

0.803

0.645

  

Is it worth it?

AT

1.000

    

0.755

0.570

0.788

0.651

ENJ

1.013

0.087

11.658

***

 

0.856

0.733

  

Physical activity

PA1

1.000

    

0.854

0.729

0.878

0.706

PA2

0.924

0.045

20.694

***

 

0.821

0.674

  

PA3

1.052

0.049

21.500

***

 

0.845

0.714

  
  1. Note: N = 463. Unstd, unstandardized factor loading; SE, standard error; Std, standardized factor loading; SMC, item reliability; CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted; *** p <.001