Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: The impact and perceptions of standing desk interventions on movement patterns and physical, mental, and academic outcomes in university students: a scoping review

Author (year)

Country

Study design

N (% female)

Age, mean (SD)

Recruitment

Bantoft et al. (2016) [31]

Australia

Counterbalanced RCT

45 students (71.1)

22.7 (6.3)

University, NR

Benzo et al. (2016) [26]

United States

Cross-sectional

993 students (69.7); 149 instructors (57.1)

20.4 (4.1); 43.1 (13.7)

By email, university

Butler et al. (2018) [32]

United States

Cross-over RCT

21 students (38.1)

22.7 (6.4)

Poster advertisement and word-of-mouth

Chim et al. (2021) [35]

The Netherlands

Parallel RCT

96 students (53.0)

19.9 (1.4)

Convenience sample of first year students

Chrisman et al. (2020) [42]

United States

Pre-post trial

22 students (73.0)

25.3 (6.2)

Flyers on campus and word of mouth

Chrisman et al. (2021) [30]

United States

Parallel RCT

48 students (90.0); IG: 21; CG: 27

21.5 (4.9)

Flyers and posters on the campus

Finch et al. (2017) [36]

United States

Counterbalanced RCT

96 students (80.2)

20.9 (3.0)

Convenience sample from psychology university

Frost & Terbizan (2018) [34]

United States

Parallel RCT

23 students (NR); IG: 14; CG: 9

IG: 21.2 (3.5); CG: 23.8 (6.6)

Two classes of a university

Frost & Terbizan (2020) [33]

United States

Parallel RCT

23 students (NR); IG: 14; CG: 9

IG: 23.8 (6.6); CG: 21.2 (3.5)

Two classes of a university

Goodrich et al. (2020) [29]

United States

Cross-sectional and qualitative

210 students (NR)

NR

Purposive sampling at business school

Green et al. (2020) [37]

United States

Quasi-experimental crossover

88 students (54.5)

21.6 (6.6)

Purposive sampling of a classroom

Grosprêtre et al. (2021) [27]

France

Pre-post trial

663 students (37.1); 14 instructors (75.0)

18.7 (1.6); NR

Purposive sample of one classroom

Jerome et al. (2017) [38]

United States

Quasi-experimental crossover

304 students (73.9)

20.1 (1.3)

Purposive sample of two classrooms

Moulin et al. (2022) [39]

Canada

Pre-post trial and qualitative

Study 1: 25 students (95.0)

Study 2: 28 students (82.0)

NR

Email and social networks in university

Raulli (2017) [40]

United States

Pre-post trial

50 students (58.0)

21.3 (2.6)

Purposive sample of a university course

Rostami et al. (2022) [41]

Iran

Quasi-experimental crossover

40 students (50.0)

25.0 (1.6)

Random sampling

Sengupta & Kuilan (2023) [28]

United States

Cross-sectional

178 students (33.0)

22.4 (4.7)

Random sampling by email

  1. Abbreviations: CG control group, IG intervention group, N sample size, NR not reported, RCT randomized controlled trial, SD standard deviation