Skip to main content

Table 4 SPAP RCT Program Results: high-quality RCT with significant effect size results

From: Factors for adherence to a physical activity promotion program in the workplace: a systematic review

Intervention duration

Reviewed RCT

Programs

Min–Max number of participants

Min–Max Adherence (IG) at the end of the program

Compliance at the end of the program

(min–max rates)

Significant outcomes: Increase PA, and Health outcomes

IG

CG

1–2 months

10

29–213

26–96%

60–96%a

59–100%

10/10b

3 months

6

30–294

45–85%

59–100%

17–99%

6/6

4–6 months

9

59–537

33–81%

52–87%

69–97%

9/9

9 months- 1 year

3

82–389

56–78%

53–72%

69–82%

3/3

Total

28

29–537

26–96%

52–100%

17–99%

28/28(45)

  1. RCT Randomized controlled trial, IG Interventional group, CG Control group
  2. aCompliance was also evaluated 15 months after the end of program for one RCT: IG(SUP): 15/25 (60%) vs CG(CON): 19/25 (76%) (Supplementary File 2; ref. n°36; Hunter JR, 2018)
  3. bWith maintenance effect at 6 months and 12 months follow-up for one RCT (Supplementary File 2; ref. n°39; Krebs S, 2019)