Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Definitions of the rules generating disease outcomes

From: Exploring the potential and limitations of deep learning and explainable AI for longitudinal life course analysis

LCP

 

Positive (%)

Definition

Period

1

2.96

At least one Loss exposure event in the first two years of life.

2

2.27

At least two Loss exposure events in the first five years of life.

3

1.68

Weighted sum of Loss exposures exceeds 1. Events in the first two years are unweighted; from age 2–4 are weighted by 0.5; age 5–11 by 0.2; and age 12–15 by 0.1.

Repeats

1

1.37

Four or more consecutive Dynamic exposure events.

2

1.30

At least two instances of two consecutive years of Dynamic exposure events.

3

1.77

At least two consecutive years of both Loss and SES exposure events.

Order

1

5.68

First Dynamic exposure event precedes the first Loss exposure event, with at least one occurrence of each.

2

1.98

First two Dynamic exposure events precede the first Loss exposure event, with at least one occurrence of each.

3

1.80

Similar to Order 1, but the effect is mitigated if SES exposure events occur.

Timing

1

3.10

Loss and SES exposure events occur in the same year at least once.

2

1.11

Loss and SES exposure events occur within one year of each other at least twice.

3

2.50

Loss and SES exposure events occur within four years of each other at least twice.

  1. Each Life Course Pattern (LCP) is described alongside its definition and the percentage of positive outcomes. The increasing numbers in the name indicate increased complexity of the pattern