Skip to main content

Table 5 Category multiple logistic regression analyses of participants self-reported choosing not to report regarding a victim and perpetrator within the last 12 months and throughout career

From: Compliance with mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence among professionals in Norway

 

Victim

Perpetrator

 

Last 12 months*

Throughout career†

Last 12 months‡

Throughout career**

Item

OR

Sig.

CI

OR

Sig.

CI

OR

Sig.

CI

OR

Sig.

CI

Sociodemographic characteristics

  Gender

         

.448

.096

.174

  Profession

1.179

.137

.949

         

  Year in position

   

1.024

.210

.9867 – 1.063

   

1.014

.605

.961 – 1.070

  Age

1.023

.181

.989 – 1.057

1.0217

.197

.9889 – 1.055

   

1.061

.027

1.007 – 1.117

Experience with IPV

  IPV victim – career

1.158

.029

1.015 – 1.319

1.175

.003

1.056 – 1.307

1.049

.754

.778 – 1.415

.965

.728

.788 – 1.181

  IPV victim – 12 month

1.124

.156

.956 – 1.321

.947

.437

.826 – 1.086

1.037

.808

.772 – 1.395

   

  IPV perpetrator – career

.913

.234

.785 – 1.061

.947

.355

.845 – 1.063

1.261

.161

.912 – 1.742

1.459

.001

1.163 – 1.831

  IPV perpetrator – 12 months

1.369

.103

.939 – 1.995

   

.964

.921

.469 – 1.983

.559

.040

.321 – .973

  Severe IPV victim – 12 months

.752

.107

.531 – 1.064

1.073

.392

.914 – 1.259

   

.931

.591

.716 – 1.209

  Severe physical injury victim - career

1.215

.043

1.006 – 1.466

.979

.805

.834 – 1.151

1.362

.049

1.001 – 1.851

1.209

.096

.967 – 1.511

  Severe physical injury victim – 12 months

1.549

.031

1.040 – 2.306

1.262

.155

.916 – 1.739

.813

.558

.406 – 1.626

   

  Severe physical injury perpetrator – career

         

.788

.216

.539 – 1.149

  Severe physical injury perpetrator – 12 months

      

2.159

.233

.609 – 7.659

2.333

.081

.902 – 6.037

Expectations about MR-IPV

  I am very unsure what consequences it would have had for my patient/client/user

      

3.023

.046

1.028 – 8.974

   

  The MR-IPV case would have made me a more secure professional

1.808

.044

1.017 – 3.212

   

2.947

.110

.782 – 11.109

   

  The MR-IPV case would have few consequences for me personally

.593

.012

.396 - 891

.812

.188

.595 – 1.107

      

  I would have received good and adequate support from colleagues

         

4.280

.173

.528 – 34.707

Perceived application of MR-IPV

  Victim

1.168

.011

1.036 – 1.316

1.179

.005

1.052 – 1.323

   

.947

.642

.752 – 1.192

  Perpetrator

1.017

.841

.863 – 1.198

1.007

.929

.864 – 1.173

   

1.377

.008

1.086 – 1.746

Knowledge of MR-IPV

  Knowledge of MR-IPV

2.459

.033

1.073 – 5.637

2.145

.018

1.140 – 4.035

      

  Knowledge of MR in field

.524

.130

.227 – 1.209

.783

.440

.419 – 1.458

      

  Knowledge of criteria

1.555

.184

.811 – 2.979

1.027

.916

.614 – 1.690

      

Perceptions of MR compliance

  Compliance in general

   

.859

.583

.500 – 1.476

      

  Compliance by leaders

.865

.754

.349 – 2.144

   

1.136

.848

.308 – 4.187

   

  Compliance by colleagues

.698

.391

.306 – 1.588

   

.086

<.001

.022 - .339

   

  Compliance by other agencies

   

.653

.074

.409 – 1.042

2.412

.315

.434 – 13.419

   

Perceptions of workplace time management

  Time spent with patients etc

         

.819

.069

.661 – 1.016

  Meetings

      

1.498

.107

.917 – 2.447

1.158

.278

.888

  Impractical working conditions

1.371

.045

1.006 – 1.867

1.269

.072

.979 – 1.648

      

  Unnecessary tasks and meetings

.897

.519

.646 – 1.247

.951

.720

1.254

      
  1. *N range =  282 - 333
  2. †N range = 254 - 328
  3. ‡N range = 296 - 320
  4. **N range = 249 - 320