From: Compliance with mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence among professionals in Norway
Victim | Perpetrator | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Last 12 months* | Throughout career† | Last 12 months‡ | Throughout career** | |||||||||
Item | OR | Sig. | CI | OR | Sig. | CI | OR | Sig. | CI | OR | Sig. | CI |
Sociodemographic characteristics | ||||||||||||
Gender | .448 | .096 | .174 | |||||||||
Profession | 1.179 | .137 | .949 | |||||||||
Year in position | 1.024 | .210 | .9867 – 1.063 | 1.014 | .605 | .961 – 1.070 | ||||||
Age | 1.023 | .181 | .989 – 1.057 | 1.0217 | .197 | .9889 – 1.055 | 1.061 | .027 | 1.007 – 1.117 | |||
Experience with IPV | ||||||||||||
IPV victim – career | 1.158 | .029 | 1.015 – 1.319 | 1.175 | .003 | 1.056 – 1.307 | 1.049 | .754 | .778 – 1.415 | .965 | .728 | .788 – 1.181 |
IPV victim – 12 month | 1.124 | .156 | .956 – 1.321 | .947 | .437 | .826 – 1.086 | 1.037 | .808 | .772 – 1.395 | |||
IPV perpetrator – career | .913 | .234 | .785 – 1.061 | .947 | .355 | .845 – 1.063 | 1.261 | .161 | .912 – 1.742 | 1.459 | .001 | 1.163 – 1.831 |
IPV perpetrator – 12 months | 1.369 | .103 | .939 – 1.995 | .964 | .921 | .469 – 1.983 | .559 | .040 | .321 – .973 | |||
Severe IPV victim – 12 months | .752 | .107 | .531 – 1.064 | 1.073 | .392 | .914 – 1.259 | .931 | .591 | .716 – 1.209 | |||
Severe physical injury victim - career | 1.215 | .043 | 1.006 – 1.466 | .979 | .805 | .834 – 1.151 | 1.362 | .049 | 1.001 – 1.851 | 1.209 | .096 | .967 – 1.511 |
Severe physical injury victim – 12 months | 1.549 | .031 | 1.040 – 2.306 | 1.262 | .155 | .916 – 1.739 | .813 | .558 | .406 – 1.626 | |||
Severe physical injury perpetrator – career | .788 | .216 | .539 – 1.149 | |||||||||
Severe physical injury perpetrator – 12 months | 2.159 | .233 | .609 – 7.659 | 2.333 | .081 | .902 – 6.037 | ||||||
Expectations about MR-IPV | ||||||||||||
I am very unsure what consequences it would have had for my patient/client/user | 3.023 | .046 | 1.028 – 8.974 | |||||||||
The MR-IPV case would have made me a more secure professional | 1.808 | .044 | 1.017 – 3.212 | 2.947 | .110 | .782 – 11.109 | ||||||
The MR-IPV case would have few consequences for me personally | .593 | .012 | .396 - 891 | .812 | .188 | .595 – 1.107 | ||||||
I would have received good and adequate support from colleagues | 4.280 | .173 | .528 – 34.707 | |||||||||
Perceived application of MR-IPV | ||||||||||||
Victim | 1.168 | .011 | 1.036 – 1.316 | 1.179 | .005 | 1.052 – 1.323 | .947 | .642 | .752 – 1.192 | |||
Perpetrator | 1.017 | .841 | .863 – 1.198 | 1.007 | .929 | .864 – 1.173 | 1.377 | .008 | 1.086 – 1.746 | |||
Knowledge of MR-IPV | ||||||||||||
Knowledge of MR-IPV | 2.459 | .033 | 1.073 – 5.637 | 2.145 | .018 | 1.140 – 4.035 | ||||||
Knowledge of MR in field | .524 | .130 | .227 – 1.209 | .783 | .440 | .419 – 1.458 | ||||||
Knowledge of criteria | 1.555 | .184 | .811 – 2.979 | 1.027 | .916 | .614 – 1.690 | ||||||
Perceptions of MR compliance | ||||||||||||
Compliance in general | .859 | .583 | .500 – 1.476 | |||||||||
Compliance by leaders | .865 | .754 | .349 – 2.144 | 1.136 | .848 | .308 – 4.187 | ||||||
Compliance by colleagues | .698 | .391 | .306 – 1.588 | .086 | <.001 | .022 - .339 | ||||||
Compliance by other agencies | .653 | .074 | .409 – 1.042 | 2.412 | .315 | .434 – 13.419 | ||||||
Perceptions of workplace time management | ||||||||||||
Time spent with patients etc | .819 | .069 | .661 – 1.016 | |||||||||
Meetings | 1.498 | .107 | .917 – 2.447 | 1.158 | .278 | .888 | ||||||
Impractical working conditions | 1.371 | .045 | 1.006 – 1.867 | 1.269 | .072 | .979 – 1.648 | ||||||
Unnecessary tasks and meetings | .897 | .519 | .646 – 1.247 | .951 | .720 | 1.254 |