Table 3 Univariate logistic regression analyses on participants’ self-reported choosing not to report regarding a victim and perpetrator within the last 12 months and throughout career

Experience with IPV

  IPV victim – career

1.216

<.001

1.125 – 1.314

1.154

<.001

1.089 – 1.223

1.232

.034

1.016 – 1.494

1.149

.006

1.039 – 1.272

  IPV victim – 12 months

1.208

<.001

1.117 – 1.307

1.119

.002

1.042 – 1.201

1.146

.100

.974 – 1.349

1.061

.329

.942 – 1.193

  IPV perpetrator – career

1.043

.234

.973 – 1.119

1.057

.061

.997 – 1.120

1.193

.016

1.033 – 1.378

1.226

<.001

1.118 – 1.343

  IPV perpetrator – 12 months

1.149

.070

.989 – 1.337

1.057

.459

.912 – 1.226

1.289

.044

1.007 – 1.651

1.336

.004

1.097 – 1.626

  Severe IPV victim - career

1.176

<.001

1.094 – 1.263

1.157

<.001

1.085 – 1.234

1.119

.151

.959 – 1.304

1.107

.047

1.001 – 1.223

  Severe IPV victim – 12 months

1.181

.008

1.045 – 1.335

1.185

.008

1.046 – 1.342

1.051

.739

.784 – 1.408

1.119

.202

.941 – 1.332

  Severe IPV perpetrator – career

1.049

.302

.958 – 1.147

1.074

.070

.994 – 1.160

1.140

.112

.969 – 1.341

1.198

.001

1.081 – 1.327

  Severe IPV perpetrator – 12 months

1.166

.139

.951 – 1.430

1.150

.225

.918 – 1.442

1.245

.151

.923 – 1.678

1.578

.003

1.172 – 2.126

  Severe physical injury victim - career

1.274

<.001

1.173 – 1.383

1.173

<.001

1.087 – 1.266

1.210

.011

1.045 – 1.402

1.152

.009

1.037 – 1.280

  Severe physical injury victim – 12 months

1.569

<.001

1.257 – 1.960

1.396

.002

1.133 – 1.723

1.193

.196

.913 – 1.559

1.119

.360

.879 – 1.423

  Severe physical injury perpetrator - career

1.071

.180

.969 – 1.183

1.094

.049

1.000 – 1.197

1.179

.053

.998 – 1.395

1.188

.004

1.058 – 1.335

  Severe physical injury perpetrator – 12 months

1.204

.135

.944 – 1.536

1.258

.128

.936 – 1.691

1.284

.086

.965 – 1.708

1.476

.014

1.081 – 2.016

Expectations about MR-IPV

  I would have been reproached by the patient/client/user/relatives afterwards

.657

.158

.367 – 1.177

.683

.122

.421 – 1.108

1.245

.748

.328 – 4.719

.751

.473

.343 – 1.644

  There is a high probability that it would have had positive consequences for the patient/client/user

1.455

.196

.824 – 2.569

1.051

.829

.667 – 1.657

1.458

.556

.415 – 5.126

1.128

.753

.531 – 2.397

  I am very unsure what consequences it would have had for my patient/client/user

1.033

.872

.695 – 1.536

.958

.793

.694 – 1.323

2.558

.087

.872 – 7.506

1.225

.469

.707 – 2.121

  The MR-IPV case would have made it more difficult to work afterwards

.793

.431

.445 – 1.412

.724

.181

.451 – 1.162

1.195

.762

.376 – 3.799

1.024

.950

.489 – 2.145

  The MR-IPV case would have had a negative impact on my private life

.668

.237

.343 – 1.304

.674

.148

.395 – 1.149

.656

.589

.143 – 3.019

.716

.471

.289 – 1.776

  The MR-IPV case would have made me a more secure professional

1.760

.039

1.029 – 3.010

1.159

.473

.774 – 1.735

2.175

.237

.601 – 7.877

1.377

.370

.684 – 2.769

  The MR-IPV case would have made me a more fearful professional

.582

.097

.307 – 1.102

.629

.065

.386 – 1.028

1.333

.610

.442 – 4.019

.737

.463

.326 – 1.666

  The MR-IPV case would have few consequences for me personally

.557

.005

.369 - .840

.759

.081

.558 – 1.035

.689

.403

.288 – 1.649

1.015

.954

.617 – 1.668

  I would have received good and adequate support from the leaders at my workplace

.981

.949

.548 – 1.758

1.053

.833

.649 – 1.707

††

††

††

1.925

.202

.704 – 5.268

  I would have received good and adequate support from colleagues

.896

.742

.465 – 1.727

1.508

.193

.812 – 2.800

1.633

.610

.248 – 10.752

4.761

.115

.683 – 33.183

Perceived application of MR-IPV

  Victim

1.170

.002

1.059 – 1.293

1.175

.001

1.069 – 1.293

1.017

.899

.780 – 1.327

1.142

.046

1.002 – 1.301

  Perpetrator

1.142

.055

.997 – 1.308

1.134

.052

.999 – 1.288

1.147

.275

.897 – 1.467

1.134

<.001

1.134 – 1.539

Knowledge of MR-IPV

  Knowledge of MR-IPV

1.999

.006

1.218 – 3.282

1.885

.002

1.255 – 2.831

.745

.576

.265 – 2.095

1.641

.142

.848 – 3.178

  Knowledge of MR in field

1.433

.144

.884 – 2.323

1.427

.075

.965 – 2.110

.926

.879

.345 – 2.488

1.396

.322

.722 – 2.699

  Knowledge of criteria

1.829

.014

1.130 – 2.959

1.409

.075

.966 – 2.054

.845

.731

.324 – 2.204

1.176

.611

.630 – 2.192

Perceptions of MR-IPV compliance

  Compliance in general

.821

.514

.455 – 1.483

.716

.182

.439 – 1.169

.537

.265

.180 – 1.602

.917

.835

.406 – 2.072

  Compliance by leaders

.643

.148

.353 – 1.170

.823

.476

.481 – 1.407

.266

.006

.105 - .679

.703

.383

.319 – 1.550

  Compliance by colleagues

.633

.098

.368 – 1.088

.786

.328

.485 – 1.273

.151

<.001

.0628 - .363

.564

.096

.287 – 1.107

  Compliance by agencies

.792

.369

.476 – 1.317

.619

.028

.404 - .949

.451

.158

.149 – 1.362

.819

.570

.412 – 1.629

Experience with risk assessment tools

  Experience with risk assessment tools

1.178

.069

.987 – 1.407

1.120

.161

.956 – 1.313

1.206

.243

.881 – 1.651

1.100

.425

.870 – 1.391

Perceptions of workplace time management

  Work with patients etc.

1.059

.535

.883 – 1.269

1.049

.515

.909 – 1.211

1.281

.275

.821 – 1.998

.849

.128

.687 – 1.048

  Meetings

1.106

.291

.917 – 1.333

1.045

.577

.896 – 1.219

1.494

.038

1.022 – 2.185

1.194

.144

.941 – 1.515

  Paperwork, phone calls, emails, etc.

1.086

.400

.896 – 1.317

1.009

.914

.863 – 1.178

1.277

.227

.859 – 1.899

.939

.622

.733 – 1.204

  Professional development

1.100

.421

.872 – 1.388

1.166

.120

.961 – 1.415

.972

.912

.592 – 1.598

1.231

.153

.926 – 1.636

  Impractical working conditions

1.267

.013

1.050 – 1.528

1.249

.007

1.063 – 1.467

1.212

.309

.837 – 1.755

1.039

.768

.804 – 1.343

  Unnecessary tasks and meetings

1.161

.140

.952 – 1.416

1.178

.057

.995 – 1.394

1.079

.716

.716 – 1.625

1.015

.912

.775 – 1.331