Associations between patient sociodemographic characteristics and lack of treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results from a complete nationwide, unselected, real-world register study in Denmark

Table 2 Regression estimates on different factors’ association with receipt of systemic treatment*

	Association with clinical factors		Multivariate association
	Estimate	P-value	Estimate	P-value
Region of residence
Region Zealand			−0.068	0.031
Region South			−0.034	0.237
Region Mid			−0.014	0.651
Region North			−0.128	0.001
Capital Region			0	.
Education
High school			0.0914	< 0.0001
Gross income, €10,000			0.0024	0.188
Female			0.019	0.407
Married			0.099	< 0.0001
Clinically relevant factors
Age	−0.019	< 0.0001	X
T4b	−0.111	0.003	X
N2/3	0.002	0.940	X
M1 (any of the variables indicating metastatic disease)	−0.059	0.0074	X
Malignant neoplasm of renal pelvis (C65)	0.082	0.008	X
Malignant neoplasm of ureter (C66)	0.185	0.0001	X
Malignant neoplasm of bladder (C67)	.	.	X
Malignant neoplasm of other and unspecified urinary organs (C68)	−0.064	0.4509
CCI 1–3	−0.047	0.034	X
CCI > 3	−0.168	< 0.0001	X
CCI 0	.	.	X

Xs indicate that the analysis also included adjustment for the clinically relevant factors. However, the parameter estimates for the clinically relevant factors are not presented
*Analysis of patients in cohort 2 (n = 1141) vs. patients in cohort 3 who were alive after 1.3 months from mUC diagnosis (n = 596)
CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index

ISSN: 1471-2458