Skip to main content

Table 5 Unadjusted and adjusted nutrition knowledge and attitude score

From: Effects of the MyBFF@school obesity intervention program with nutrition education intervention on nutrition knowledge and attitude of secondary schoolchildren: a cluster randomized controlled trial

 

DESCRIPTIVE (baseline)

MODEL1

Intervention

Control

Crude modela

Adjusted modelb

N

Mean (SD)

N

Mean (SD)

Comparative

statisticc

Comparative

statisticc

95% CI

ICC

Nutrition knowledge score (%)

Overall

579

65.42 (15.99)

462

65.30 (18.27)

1.03

0.33

−4.36, 5.02

0.047

Gender

 Boys

234

63.96 (16.60)

196

64.87 (18.72)

−2.32

−2.54

−8.42, 3.34

0.038

 Girls

345

66.41 (15.50)

266

65.62 (17.95)

2.81

2.12

−3.15, 7.38

0.056

Location

 Urban

330

64.96 (15.96)

337

64.86 (16.20)

0.18

0.22

−5.11, 5.57

 < 0.000

 Rural

249

66.04 (16.03)

125

66.49 (22.97)

3.16

0.21

−8.33, 8.75

 < 0.000

Ethnicity

 Malay

486

67.28 (14.63)

337

67.08 (17.78)

1.03

1.05

−3.65, 5.75

 < 0.000

 Non-Malay

93

55.69 (19.07)

125

60.51 (18.77)

−1.01

−1.76

−10.39, 6.88

 < 0.000

Nutrition attitude score (%)

Overall

579

63.49 (9.11)

462

62.87 (9.01)

0.10

0.19

−1.17, 1.56

0.006

Gender

 Boys

234

64.93 (9.02)

196

63.75 (9.03)

−0.22

−0.01

−2.13, 2.12

0.001

 Girls

345

62.52 (9.04)

266

62.22 (8.97)

0.342

0.389

−1.40, 2.18

0.008

Location

 Urban

330

63.09 (9.69)

337

62.80 (8.96)

0.33

0.44

−1.50, 2.39

0.010

 Rural

249

64.03 (8.26)

125

63.05 (9.18)

0.11

0.19

−2.34, 2.72

1.25 × 10–18

Ethnicity

 Malay

486

63.60 (8.91)

337

62.26 (8.70)

0.55

0.55

−0.96, 2.06

0.003

 Non-Malay

93

62.91 (10.08)

125

64.51 (9.66)

−1.46

−1.37

−5.08, 2.34

0.014

  1. ICC – intra cluster (intra-school) correlation coefficient
  2. *p < 0.05
  3. **p < 0.01
  4. ***p < 0.001
  5. aAdjusted for school mean score (nutrition knowledge and attitude) at baseline
  6. bAdjusted for school mean score at baseline, gender, location, ethnicity and school group (intervention vs control)
  7. cMean difference (intervention vs control)
  8. dResults from mixed effects modelscMean difference (intervention vs control)