Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression examining the association of parent-child connectedness and covariates with marijuana use among the sample studied

From: Does parent-child connectedness influence substance use among Bhutanese adolescents: evidence from a national survey?

Study

Variables

Bivariate

Analysis

Multivariate Analysis

Model 1

Model 2

AOR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI)

P–Value

AOR (95% CI)

P–Value

Explanatory Variable

      

   Parental Homework Supervision (Yes) ¥

0.682 [0.555 – 0.838]

0.001***

0.794 [0.653 – 0.965]

0.022*

0.849 [0.706–1.021]

0.080

   Parents Understand Problems (Yes) ¥

0.693 [0.580 – 0.829]

0.001***

0.832 [0.695 – 0.998]

0.047*

0.927 [0.748–1.148]

0.471

   Parental Free Time Supervision (Yes) ¥

0.563 [0.476 – 0.666]

0.001***

0.629 [0.525 – 0.755]

0.001***

0.871 [0.714–1.062]

0.163

Other Substance Use

      

   Alcohol (Yes) ¥

13.254 [10.494–16.740]

0.001***

  

6.911 [5.531–8.634]

0.001***

Socio-Demographics

      

Sex

      

   Female (ref.)

Ref.

   

Ref.

 

   Male

6.144 [4.869–7.754]

0.001***

  

3.859 [2.993–4.975]

0.001***

Age

      

   ≤13

Ref

   

Ref.

 

   14–16

2.034 [1.520–2.721]

   

1.713 [1.345–2.180]

0.001***

   ≥16

3.182 [2.328–4.350]

0.001***

  

2.104 [1.591–2.782]

0.001***

Socioemotional Distress

      

   No close friends (Yes) ¥

0.726 [0.544 – 0.970]

0.031*

  

0.827 [0.558 – 0.1.225]

0.329

   Anxiety (Yes) ¥

1.458 [1.125–1.889]

0.006**

  

1.034 [0.703–1.519]

0.861

   Bullied (Yes) ¥

1.115 [ 0.940–1.323]

0.201

  

0.666 [0.549 – 0.807]

0.001***

   Physically attacked (Yes) ¥

2.054 [1.707–2.471]

0.001***

  

1.057 [0.883–1.267]

0.530

   Physically Fight (Yes) ¥

3.136 [2.614–3.761]

0.001***

  

1.925 [1.620–2.288]

0.001***

Contextual Factors

      

   Peer Support (Yes) ¥

0.698 [0.592 – 0.824]

0.001***

  

0.758 [0.629 – 0.914]

0.005**

   Loneliness (Yes) ¥

1.287 [1.043–1.588]

0.020*

  

1.246 [0.933–1.664]

0.131

   Passive Smoking (Yes) ¥

8.293 [6.450–10.663]

0.001***

  

3.751 [2.958–4.757]

0.001***

   School Truancy (Yes) ¥

2.970 [2.561–3.445]

0.001***

  

1.726 [1.466–2.033]

0.001***

  1. Note *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001; AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio. ¥ = Indicates Reference Category is NO
  2. Model 1: Crude Model (Explanatory variables)
  3. Model 2: Model 1 + Control variables (Other Substance Use + Sociodemographic, Socio-emotional Distress + Contextual Factors)
  4. All models were adjusted for the complex survey design, including sampling weights, clustering, and stratification