Skip to main content

Table 5 Distribution of ED presentations by opioid use context

From: A mixed methods study on poisoning and injury-related emergency department visits associated with opioids in Canada, 2011 to 2022: from the Canadian hospitals injury reporting and prevention program

A. Presenting poisoning effect

(n = 7,522   % of total visits [95% CI] = 92.7% [92.1 – 93.3%] )

opioid use context

A1. poisoning effect only

A2. with (1) unintentional or self-inflicted injuries under the influence of opioids; or (2) injuries sustained during a conflict related to opioids; or (3) being sexually assaulted related to opioids

A3. with injuries (cuts, burns etc.) sustained during opioid administration

A4. with injuries not related to opioid use

I. Non-prescribed opioid use, without intention to cause harm

3,296 (88.2%)

341 (9.1%)

5 (0.1%)

97 (2.6%)

II. Medication error

170 (94.4%)

10 (5.5%)

0 (0%)

2 (1.1%)

III. Children’s exposure

278 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

IV. Mother’s opioid use

10 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

V. Medical treatment

13 (81.3%)

3 (18.7%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

VI. Other context, without intention to cause harm

30 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

VII. Unclear context, without intention to cause harm

1,580 (97.8%)

18 (1.1%)

9 (0.6%)

8 (0.5%)

VIII. Self-poisoning

911 (99.0%)

9 (1.0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

IX. Poisoned by opioids

12 (66.7%)

6 (33.3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

X. Unclear context, undetermined intent to cause harm

711 (99.6%)

2 (0.3%)

0 (0%)

1 (0.1%)

B. Presenting opioid withdrawal effect

(n = 89   % of total visits [95% CI] = 1.1% [0.9 – 1.3%])

opioid use context

B1. withdrawal effect only

B2. with unintentional or self-inflicted injuries caused by withdrawal effect

B3. with injuries (cuts, burns etc.) sustained during opioid administration

B4. with injuries not related to opioid

I. Non-prescribed opioid use, without intention to cause harm

54 (96.4%)

1 (1.8%)

0 (0%)

1 (1.8%)

V. Medical treatment

18 (90%)

1 (5%)

0 (0%)

1 (5%)

VII. Unclear context, without intention to cause harm

11 (84.6%)

1 (7.7%)

0 (0%)

1 (7.7%)

C. no opioid poisoning effect presented, but the injuries were related to opioid use

(n = 427   % of total visits [95% CI] = 5.3% [4.8 – 5.8%])

opioid use context

 

C1. (1) unintentional or self-inflicted injuries under the influence of opioids; or (2) injuries sustained during a conflict related to opioids; or (3) being sexually assaulted related to opioids

C2. Needle-related skin problems or burns sustained during opioid administration

 

I. Non-prescribed opioid use, without intention to cause harm

 

254 (87.9%)

35 (12.1%)

 

II. Medication error

 

33 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

V. Medical treatment

 

8 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

VI. Other context, without intention to cause harm

 

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

VII. Unclear context, without intention to cause harm

 

87 (98.9%)

1 (1.1%)

 

VIII. Self-poisoning

 

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

X. Unclear context, undetermined intent to cause harm

 

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

D. The main purpose of ED visit was related to opioids (e.g. to request rehabilitation, to refill opioid prescription, for screening), but there were no poisonings or injuries related to opioids. The patient could have injuries not related to opioids.

(n = 56   % of total visits [95% CI] = 0.7% [0.5 – 0.9%])

opioid use context

 

D1. no poisonings/injuries

D2. with injuries not related to opioid use

 

I. Non-prescribed opioid use, without intention to cause harm

 

17 (85%)

3 (15%)

 

III. Children’s exposure

 

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

 

V. Medical treatment

 

7 (77.8%)

2 (22.2%)

 

VII. Unclear context, without intention to cause harm

 

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

VIII. Self-poisoning

 

2 (40%)

3 (60%)

 

X. Unclear context, undetermined intent to cause harm

 

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

 
  1. Note:
  2. 1. The percentage in bracket in each cell is the row percentage.
  3. 2. The nature of injury information is missing for 18 cases that are excluded from the Table.
  4. 3. For 11 visits, the main purpose was to request rehabilitation; for another 23 visits, rehabilitation was requested other than treatment.
  5. 4. For each opioid use context in Section A, the distribution of ED presentations was tested between Category I (reference) and each of the other categories: P < 0.05 for all pairs except for (I, IV) and (I, V).
  6. 5. For each opioid use context in Section B, the distribution of ED presentations was tested between Category I (reference) and each of the other categories: P > 0.05 for all pairs.
  7. 6. For each opioid use context in Section C, the distribution of ED presentations was tested between Category I (reference) and each of the other categories: P < 0.05 for (I, II) and (I, VII), P > 0.05 for all the other pairs .
  8. 7. For each opioid use context in Section D, the distribution of ED presentations was tested between Category I (reference) and each of the other categories: P > 0.05 for all pairs.