Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 6 Truth table of consolidated model – essential conditions to prompt successful educational interventions focusing on pregnant women

From: Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis

Row

Group based delivery

Communication (IEC) materials

Partner of family member involvement

Interaction with providers

Outcome

Number of cases

inclS*

PRI**

Cases

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

Valiani (2014),[69] Rouhe (2013) [37]

2

1

1

1

0

1

2

1

1

Sharifirad (2013), [68] Feinberg (2015) [71]

3

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

Bastani (2005) [70]

4

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

Montgomery (2007) [43]

5

0

1

0

1

0

3

0

0

Fraser (1997), Fenwick (2015), [41] Saisto (2001) [42]

6

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

Masoumi (2016), [39] Navaee (2015) [40]

  1. *Inclusion score (InclS), also known as consistency, indicates the degree to which the evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that there is sufficient relation between the configuration and the outcome; **Proportional Reduction in Inconsistency (PRI) refers to the extent in which a configuration is sufficient in triggering successful outcome as well as the negation of the outcome
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us