Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated response means (for continuous variables) and probabilities (for categorical variables) in each lifestyle profile

From: Associations between data-driven lifestyle profiles and cognitive function in the AusDiab study

Lifestyle behaviour

Profile 1 “Inactive, poor diet”

n = 3472 (76.3%)

Profile 2 “Moderate activity, non-smokers”

n = 850 (18.7%)

Profile 3 “Highly active, unhealthy drinkers”

n = 226 (5.0%)

MINDa

6.82 [6.77, 6.87]

7.19 [7.07, 7.30]

7.17 [6.97, 7.37]

PA (hours/week)

3.03 [2.88, 3.18]

11.91 [11.45, 12.36]

23.77 [23.04, 24.50]

Sedentary time (hours/day)

6.85 [6.75, 6.94]

6.49 [6.29, 6.69]

6.33 [5.97, 6.68]

Non-drinker

0.14 [0.13, 0.15]

0.09 [0.07, 0.12]

0.10 [0.06, 0.14]

Drinker meeting recommendations

0.50 [0.49, 0.52]

0.49 [0.45, 0.53]

0.43 [0.37, 0.50]

Drinker exceeding recommendations

0.36 [0.34, 0.37]

0.42 [0.38, 0.46]

0.47 [0.39, 0.53]

Current smoker

0.06 [0.05, 0.06]

0.05 [0.03, 0.06]

0.05 [0.02, 0.08]

Ex-smoker

0.35 [0.33, 0.37]

0.34 [0.31, 0.38]

0.39 [0.33, 0.46]

Never smoker

0.59 [0.53, 0.61]

0.61 [0.57, 0.64]

0.56 [0.49, 0.62]

  1. aMIND scores range from 0–13, with higher scores indicating greater adherence
  2. Figures presented as mean [95% CI] for continuous variables and probability [95% CI] for categorical variables