Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between NFD score of rural food and nutrition system with households food security, Zahedan rural areas

From: Is nutritional functional diversity in the rural food and nutrition system associated with food security and nutrient adequacy? A case study of rural areas of Zahedan district, Iran

Predictors

Household’s food security status

Without control variables

With control variablesa

FI1

FI

OR (CI95%)

OR (CI95%)

NFD of homestead production

1.047 (0.918–1.193)

1.123 (0.930–1.355)

NFD of household’s food processing

1.023 (0.916–1.143)

1.047 (0.899–1.219)

NFD of Consumption

 Food purchased from city

0.916 (0.880–0.955)***

0.928 (0.881–0.978)**

 Food purchased from the village

1.045 (1.005–1.088)*

1.051 (1.000–1.104)*

 Received gift

1.061 (0.979–1.150)

1.057 (0.961–1.164)

 Native wild vegetables

1.311 (1.036–1.659)*

1.195 (0.890–1.604)

 Household’s diet

0.952 (0.894–1.013)

0.969 (0.895–1.048)

  1. 1Food Insecure, Food secure is reference. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
  2. a Controlled for family size, income, households received additional subsidy (in addition to the national subsidy), distance from the city, sex and education of household’s head, household’s welfare index, employment of household’s head
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us