Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Public Health

Fig. 4

From: Opportunities for prevention: a data-linkage study to inform a public health response to youth offending in the Northern Territory, Australia

Fig. 4

Relative risk over time of first alleged offence by level and timing of CPS contact. Notes: 1. Adjusted for birth-cohort effects, maternal and birth characteristics and residential location of mother at time of birth. 2. * (no record of CPS contact before age 10); N* (one or more unsubstantiated notifications but no substantiations at age 0–4, only); S* (one or more substantiated notifications at age 0–4, only); *N (one or more unsubstantiated notifications but no substantiations at age 5–9, only); *S (one or more substantiated notifications at age 5–9, only); NN (one or more unsubstantiated notifications but no substantiations, at both age 0–4 and age 5–9); SN (one or more substantiated notifications at age 0–4 and unsubstantiated notifications at age 5–9); NS (one or more unsubstantiated notifications at age 0–4 and substantiated notifications at age 5–9); SS (one or more substantiated notifications at both age 0–4 and age 5–9). 3. For subgraphs, the lines involvement become green when the 95% confidence intervals include the null value of 1, in which the reference population is the children with no record of CPS contact before age 10

Back to article page