Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Marginal effects from sex-stratified fixed-effects probit regression models of the impact of state tobacco control policies on smokeless tobacco and cigar use (N = 499,381)

From: Impact of tobacco control policies on adolescent smokeless tobacco and cigar use: a difference-in-differences approach

 

Smokeless tobacco

Cigars

 

Mean

%a Use

Marginal effect of coefficientb,c

95% CI

p Value

Mean

%a Use

Marginal effect of coefficientb,d

95% CI

p Value

Males (N = 240,733)

12.3%

  

16.8%

  

 Tobacco tax (%)

 

0.0001 (−0.0001-0.0002)

.5

 

0.0001 (−0.0002-0.0004)

.4

 Cigarette tax (%)

 

0.0010 (0.0003-0.0017)

.008

 

0.0015 (0.0006-0.0024)

.001

 100% smoke-free restaurants (yes/no)

 

0.0105 (0.0015-0.0194)

.02

 

−0.0062 (− 0.0154-0.0030)

.2

Females (N = 258,648)

2.0%

  

7.7%

  

 Tobacco tax (%)

 

−0.0000 (− 0.0001-0.0000)

.3

 

0.0002 (− 0.0001-0.0004)

.1

 Cigarette tax (%)

 

0.0003 (−0.0000-0.0006)

.09

 

0.0007 (0.0001-0.0013)

.02

 100% smoke-free restaurants (yes/no)

 

0.0002 (−0.0042-0.0046)

0.9

 

−0.0002 (− 0.0070-0.0065)

.9

  1. CI confidence interval
  2. a Weighted
  3. b Model includes adjustment for the following covariates: cigarette use, state tobacco control expenditure, age, race, state, and year
  4. c Model includes adjustment for cigar use
  5. d Model includes adjustment for smokeless tobacco use