Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Study 1. Multilevel regression model including stimulus-level and participant-level predictors. Area of Interest (AOI; Brand, health, rest, dummy coded with rest as reference category), brightness, contrast, complexity, and size were level 1 (AOI-level) predictors. Picture type (Alcohol, soda, dummy coded with soda as reference category) and presentation order were level 2 (Picture level) predictors. AUDIT scores, recent alcohol consumption, motivation to reduce drinking and dietary restraint were level 3 (Participant level) predictors. All predictors were included as individual main effects and in all possible two-way and three-way interactions with picture type and AOI

From: Alcohol consumers’ attention to warning labels and brand information on alcohol packaging: Findings from cross-sectional and experimental studies

Variable

Model 2 (stimulus-level and participant-level predictors)

 

Two-way interactions

Three-way interactions.

Main effect

× Picture type

× AOI brand

× AOI health

× AOI brand × Picture type

× AOI health × Picture type

b (SE)

b (SE)

b (SE)

b (SE)

b (SE)

b (SE)

Intercept

3.22 (0.84)

-

-

-

-

-

AOI brand

−3.73 (1.20)**

0.88 (1.72)

-

-

-

-

AOI health

−2.95 (0.97)**

0.18 (1.29)

-

-

-

-

Picture type

−0.61 (1.09)

-

0.88 (1.72)

0.18 (1.29)

-

-

Order

0.01 (0.01)

−0.01 (0.01)*

0.00 (0.01)

−0.003 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

Brightness

−0.001 (0.002)

−0.001 (0.003)

0.002 (0.003)

0.001 (0.003)

0.01 (0.01)

0.002 (0.004)

Contrast

−0.01 (0.01)*

0.01 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

−0.01 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

Complexity

11.12 (4.18)**

−1.90 (5.98)

−8.624 (4.83)+

−10.46 (4.27)*

2.41 (6.62)

−0.76 (6.13)

Size

−0.01 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

0.02 (0.01)*

0.08 (0.03)*

0.02 (0.04)

−0.02 (0.01)+

AUDIT

−0.004 (0.02)

0.01 (0.02)

0.03 (0.02)

0.004 (0.02)

−0.04 (0.03)

−0.004 (0.03)

Alcohol consumption (last 14 days)

0.002 (0.01)

−0.004 (0.01)

−0.002 (0.01)

−0.01 (0.01)

0.003 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

Motivation to reduce drinking

−0.04 (0.03)+

0.08 (0.04)**

0.01 (0.03)

0.05 (0.03)+

−0.08 (0.04)**

−0.09 (0.04)*

Dietary restraint

−0.02 (0.01)*

−0.02 (0.01)

0.02 (0.01)*

0.01 (0.01)

0.02 (0.01)

0.02 (0.01)

Random effects

Residual variance

Proportion residual variance explained

Level 3

0.14 (0.03)

1.46%

   

Level 2

3.18 (0.06)

17.15%

   

Level 1

0 (0)

 

-

   

χ 2(24)

894.27***

    
  1. Note: + p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001